Part IX: Assassination Today

This doesn’t have to be the stuff of thriller fiction novels.

 

The assassination of Anwar Sadat, 1981

 

How safe is the White House?

Recently, former Secret Service Agent Dan Bongino made the starling revelation that the White House itself is no longer safe due to the lack of Secret Service assets and outdated technology.

We truly believe that an attack consisting of multiple threats at once couldn’t be repelled or slowed long enough to get President trump into the secure bunker under the White House, or removed from the grounds via evacuation protocol.

The 2013 movie Olympus Has Fallen details how a fairly sophisticated attack could be carried out to capture the President or kill him. Even an operation of only 10-20 armed terrorists could probably execute a suicide mission and be successful. This is a sad day when our own President is so close to outside forces in his own home. Is the Secret Service really ready for a multi pronged attack on the grounds? I’ve often wondered that, and with the history of single threats gaining access even inside the house in the past, maybe it’s time the Secret Service steps up its game.

The other major threat could be an agrieved or radicalized member of the Secret service itself. A recent example is the assassination of the Russian Ambassador to turkey who was shot by his own bodyguard. Is this far fetched? Maybe not. What if the Elite simply coerce a member onto the plot threatening their entire family with mysterious death one by one if he/she wouldn’t follow through? Hell, the CIA murdered JFK with several black ops teams, in a classic set-up, what would they do today?

I already showed that it is a matter of public record that the CIA had an undetectable “heart attack gun” as far back in 1975 in order to illegally assassinate people. Now the Vault 7 leaks show that they were working on hacking modern vehicle control systems to cause fatal car crashes.

This type of technology isn’t made to decorate an office shelf. It’s made to be used. I’m not aware of any confirmed uses, but here’s a recently familiar list which is highly suspicious.

You may have heard of the Clinton kill list. Versions of it have been circling the internet since the early 1990’s. Many are not trustworthy because they include many names that were only loosely connected to the Clintons, or list people who are still alive as if they were killed. Some of the lists have up to 100 names.

WND did some digging and pared the list down to 33 actual suspicious deaths. These are people who were actually close to the Clintons, are actually dead, and died under suspicious or unsolved circumstances. As Rush Limbaugh pointed out in interview (quoted in the WND article) the vast majority of folks, even those with large public reputations, don’t have any acquaintances who died or were murdered under suspicious circumstances. For Bill and Hillary Clinton, the count is somewhere up around several dozen. Look at the list and note some of the following:

  • How many were VERY close with the Clintons.
  • How many were involved in work or writing that would paint the Clintons in a negative light, and died just before completing that work.
  • How many died unexpectedly of “heart attack”. (Heart attack gun, perhaps?)
  • Contradictory or conflicted accounts of death, like
    • Committed suicide by shooting self in the BACK of the head
    • Murder for robbery, even though nothing was stolen
    • Dropped barbell crushed throat while weight training just before testifying, but officially died of heart attack.

Elite Alt-Left Tyrant SCUM.

But it’s not as if suspicious deaths have to appear to be done by establishment types to protect the reputation of establishment types.

Here’s a list of suspicious major banker deaths since the crash, with citations to news sources. A review notes that these deaths are suspiciously all by action or heart attack; no other natural causes. The winner is definitely the one who “shot himself 7 or 8 times in the head and torso with a nail gun.” Is it establishment types knocking off folks who knew too much? Or angry citizens engaging in a bit of vigilantism? JP Morgan had motive of financial gain as well as many ties to the CIA.

Aside from the high profile JFK assassination and all its unanswered questions, there are many, many suspicious and questionable deaths occurring among those who knew too much or were in a position to blow the whistle on massive amounts of high crimes (the type that affect the course of nations).

One thing that shows Trump in an especially dangerous position is that the last man who tried to dismantle the CIA after its botched lawless behavior was JFK. Before he could make any moves to accomplish his publicly stated goal to “splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the wind,” he died suddenly under highly questionable circumstances. (Recall, as I shared above, a confirmed conspiracy is that of JFK’s death, according to the 2nd congressional hearing on it.) Seven days before he died suddenly, JFK said:

There’s a plot in this country to enslave every man, woman and child. Before I leave this high and noble office, I intend to expose this plot.

Do Americans today have more freedom or less than in the 1960’s? Much less. So, are we more enslaved now than we were back then? Absolutely.

This article wouldn’t be complete without the dire warning of President Eisenhower in the 1950’s before he left office. Most of us have seen this, however, he lived because he kept his mouth shut until the end, or he would have gone away too.

 

 

Tomorrow Part X: Balkanization and American Civil War II