Trump Assassination Leads to Civil War II and Invasion
Is this likely to be a headline coming soon to the USA?
Don’t get me wrong. I like Trump and think he has done a phenomenal job so far. If he can keep up the pace of his first month in office for eight years then it will bring prosperity back to Americans for a decade or two longer and push back the coming collapse.
But we live in a different time now than the glory days shown in those black-and-white photos from just after we won WWII. I’ve talked to many of the Boomer generation who remember exactly where they were and what they were doing when the news of the JFK assassination came out. But I have not yet met a Boomer who was glad JFK was assassinated. Today, how many people in America do you think would be celebrating in the streets if Trump was assassinated? And when you look at the whole “NeverTrump” crowd on the Republican, conservative, and evangelical end, I don’t think the celebrating would be solely leftist.
Framing The Argument
I’m not going to look into a crystal ball and pretend to tell exactly how and why this will come to pass and who will be responsible. Rather, there are only a few questions that must be answered and upon those answers we can decide, “Does it seem more likely than not that Trump will be assassinated prior to serving eight years as president?” The follow-up is, “What would happen after that?”. The answer is spine chilling and will bring you back to that gut wrenching feeling you had when Obama was elected in 2008 or re-elected in 2012. Remember that feeling of impending doom? Feeling like you were out of position? After reading this in depth article you’ll understand that now is the time to continue your preps in earnest!
The questions we must answer are as follows:
- Does an “establishment” group exist; a group interested in preserving the bureaucratic system as is; a group of elites we might call the political class or ruling class or bi-factional party?
- Does this establishment have something to gain from a collapse or a fundamental transformation of America?
- Does Trump’s populist nationalism that propelled him to victory oppose the gain of these elites?
- If the choice is put to Trump, is he more likely to change and play along with establishment agenda, or continue to be a rebel and a thorn in their side?
- If the answer to the first three are all “Yes,” and the fourth is that Trump will not change and play along, then is assassination the option of choice for elites to remove him?
- If Trump were assassinated, would it lead to civil war?
- In the chaotic time of Civil War II, would foreign powers take advantage and invade the US?
Also, prior to working through this logical chain I need to address a question at the front of many people’s minds, “Is this just a bunch of wacko conspiracy theory lunacy?”, or is this 1963 all over again?
Part I: A Brief History of Conspiracy Theory
First, “conspiracy” is a solid and extremely common legal concept. Think of any time you’ve heard about someone being charged with “Conspiracy to commit [certain crime].” At the base definition, it is simply any secret coordination of multiple parties to bring a certain outcome which would be undesirable to others if they knew about it.
Second, the smearing of theories about conspiracies occurring in the echelons of power and government was specifically a CIA counter-intelligence and disinformation method coined in 1967 and verified in the NYT in 1976 via an FOIA request. Full details can be read here, including a scan of the original CIA intelligence strategy document. Here’s the key summary of the psychological warfare tactics recommended by the CIA dispatch to help fight leaks:
- Claim that it would be impossible for so many people to keep quiet about such a big conspiracy
- Have people friendly to the CIA attack the claims, and point back to “official” reports
- Claim that eyewitness testimony is unreliable
- Claim that this is all old news, as “no significant new evidence has emerged”
- Ignore conspiracy claims unless discussion about them is already too active
- Claim that it’s irresponsible to speculate
- Accuse theorists of being wedded to and infatuated with their theories
- Accuse theorists of being politically motivated
- Accuse theorists of having financial interests in promoting conspiracy theories
In other words, the CIA’s clandestine services unit created the arguments for attacking conspiracy theories as unreliable in the 1960s as part of its psychological warfare operations.
Claim # 2 above has been used extensively to counter the 911 Truth Movement most notably framed in scientific testing and reported by AE911Truth, made up of thousands of Architects and Engineers across the world that agree that the Towers were downed by internal explosives positioned by others unknown as of yet.
It’s amazing how much we see this in use today to defend unpopular government actions. I frequently see this problem in many liberal “fact-checking” sites where when politicians stood accused of some nefariousness or wrongdoing; the “fact check” consists of pointing at the official statement released by the accused politician and declaring the matter settled. Did the DOJ under Eric Holder engage in gun-running under Operation Fast and Furious? Well, Eric Holder says they didn’t therefore they didn’t and those are the facts. (Riiiight…)
Third, today there is a long list of confirmed conspiracies which were once denounced as “unbelievable conspiracy theories.” For me, one of the most shocking recent revelations was that the Lusitania was in fact carrying munitions and the German submarine was justified in sinking her.
[Quick review for the history impaired: Prior to the US entering WWI, a passenger cruise liner named the Lusitania departed NY, headed for Liverpool, and was sunk off the coast of Ireland by a German submarine for supposedly carrying munitions to Germany’s enemies in the war. The British government denied that any munitions were aboard and moral outrage over the evil German sinking of the innocent passenger ship spiked enlistments in Ireland and Britain and helped move the US to enter the war. Documents declassified 30 years after the fact revealed that in 1982 the British government stepped in during a series of planned dives to explore the wreckage because it did in fact carry A LOT of munitions still posing a severe safety risk to exploration. So, Germany was justified in the sinking, and for almost a century anyone who suspected the British government was lying just to trick the US into joining the war was smeared as a conspiracy theorist. The “conspiracy theorists” were right and the official story recorded in history books was a lie.]
For more on conspiracy theories proven right or confirmed as true, here’s a list of 33 drawn up by Info Wars in 2010, and another list of 10 written in 2014 (slight overlap). Some of the more surprising items on the lists:
- North Vietnam did NOT actually attack US Naval warships in the Gulf of Tonkin, providing the basis for the US to enter the Vietnam War.
- The US military DID in fact conduct medical experiments on black service members during the Tuskegee Syphilis Study
- For Operation Northwoods, the CIA had planned to stage phony terrorist operations in the US to frame Cuba and draw the US into war and the plan was supported by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (Sound a little like 9-11?) JFK rejected the plan and denied promotion to its author, and was assassinated not too long thereafter.
- Speaking of JFK, were you aware there was a 2nd congressional investigation running from 1976 to 1979, which concluded that contrary to the earlier Warren Commission findings, there was definitely a conspiracy involved? Unfortunately, the who, what, why, and how remains unknown today.
- Confirmed: the US Government began spying on Americans prior to 9/11; the Patriot act (already written years before!) simply made legal what had already been illegally going on. Connected, the decision to attack Iraq predated 9/11; the 9/11 attack simply gave justification for the desired war.
- During US Senate hearings by the Church Committee in 1975 on illegal CIA assassination activities, the CIA revealed a “heart attack gun” which shot a tiny dart loaded with shellfish toxin, leaving a mark no more noticeable than a mosquito bite after the dart dissolved. If that’s the tech from 1975, what have they put into operation since then? (The Vault 7 leaks show work on hacking car control systems for modern undetectable assassinations).
- David Rockefeller proudly admitted his role in pushing for a “New World Order” with one world government and the work done to bring it about via the Council on Foreign Relations over the course of most of the 20th century.
Altogether: first conspiracy is a sound and widely prevalent legal concept with frequent convictions. Second, in 1967 the CIA formalized counterintelligence propaganda methods to smear departures from the official story as baseless conspiracy theory. Third, there is a long list of supposedly baseless “conspiracy theories” deviating from the official story – theories which history has eventually confirmed as correct.
Conspiracy doesn’t necessarily mean there is a single shadowy organization calling the shots around the globe through most of history. But if one group wants to bring down America for religious reasons, another for financial benefit, another for social reasons, and another for military reasons, they may all be acting independently. Or some may be working together under the principle that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
Is there a conspiracy to assassinate Trump? If there exist at least two members of government or its agencies plotting to do it and make sure the “official story” covers up the truth, then the answer is yes. I’m sure with all the Obama holdovers, one-world-government supporters, and bureaucrats wanting to protect their piece of the red tape jobs from Trump’s axe, we can surely find two such people. Until and unless they succeed, it is only politics as usual.
Part II: Establishment Workings
Is there an “establishment?” If there is, then what we are talking about would involve individuals on both sides of the political spectrum working together to engineer an outcome.
One of the most recent and interesting iceberg tips comes from looking at the rise and fall of Milo Yiannopoulos, a former senior editor at Breitbart News (up until recent scandal).
There are two ways of looking at the rise of the strange personality of Milo, and it depends on whether you think he tells the truth about himself.
Milo (if Honest)
If he is telling the truth, then Milo rose to notoriety by being one of the only journalists to actually give neutral coverage of the GamerGate controversy.
For those not plugged in to electronic entertainment, Gamergate was a battle over integrity in news media in late 2014. It began when it was spilled by a jilted ex-boyfriend and game journalist that a particularly terrible game designer (Zoe Quinn) and her products (i.e. Depression Quest, a “video game” with no video elements and no game elements which helps the player explore the woes of clinical depression – woohoo, sign me up to be entertained by that in my leisure time!) only got positive reviews through the large number of journalists she was sleeping with. It turned out to be the tip of the iceberg but all discussion was shut down and censored, even on politically incorrect sites like Reddit, and then nearly every game news source simultaneously launched articles attacking their prime readership as backwards misogynistic hatemongers. A subsequent leak revealed pre-planned coordination between the publications for the series of articles in order to browbeat their readers into accepting the journalists’ political agenda.
If this sounds familiar, its because we’re now seeing the same pattern for the sixth time (GamerGate being the first) now at the national political level with all the discussion of fake news.
Left-leaning sources continue to paint the entire GamerGate saga as an episode of mass misogyny by hateful intolerant commoners who won’t get on the right side of history. Supposedly, anyone (male or female) who wants female characters in their entertainment to be extremely feminine must hate females. And now on the national scale, if you didn’t vote Obama and you don’t cheer for the domestic terrorist group Black Lives Matter it can only be because you are an uneducated racist who’s likely to lynch the next black person you meet. The Alt-Left are such morons.
You might be asking, “I don’t care about video games. Why should I care about GamerGate?” Well, because since then you might have noticed that the NFL has crammed in so many pink ribbons and discussions of breast cancer and the woes of domestic violence that you’re left wondering, “Why does the NFL spend so much less time on football now?”
Answer: because the same progressive religion wants to make every entertainment outlet of yours, whether games or rock music or sci-fi/fantasy books or movies or football, stop being about entertainment and instead lecture you about the necessity of having politically correct thoughts. Maybe that also explains ESPN’s rapidly dwindling revenues.
So Milo got his start giving honest coverage of a free speech issue that was important to the average Joe when every other media source was working overtime to smear or censor the discussion. His defense of conservative values and free speech catapulted him into the limelight as he was invited to speak all over the country in defense of the same values underlying Trump’s rise to power. His odd personal quirks like being openly brash about his homosexual love of black men only augmented the demand, since here was a guy who should be playing the victim card (immigrant/mixed-race/homosexual/victim of sexual assault/raised by single parent) at DNC rallies and instead is defending conservatism.
It’s a lot like conservatives rushing to get speaking engagements for that one white guy who married/adopted/is best friends with a black person because surely he can safely address problems about race from a conservative viewpoint without being called a racist. Right? Nevertheless, if you’ve watched him in hostile interviews with mainstream media, he has a Trump-level ability to smoothly take the media’s gotcha-questions and twist them back at the media to their own embarrassment.
The final fireworks of Milo’s popularity were: violent riots at UC Berkley to prevent his last speech, an invitation to appear on Bill Maher’s show for a debate, an invitation to deliver a keynote address at CPAC, and a forthcoming book about free speech which was Amazon’s #1 Best Selling Book – on preorders alone!
Milo (if Dishonest)
The other opinion on Milo’s rise to notoriety is that he was a plant designed to make movements on the right look bad. Other than initial coverage of GamerGate, he didn’t write much about technology despite his job title at Breitbart. His depraved predilections and brash vulgarity would seem to contradict his being a popular speaker for the right to seek out as a speaker at colleges and CPAC. Was someone on the left funding his campus visits in order to embarrass and denounce those on the right?
A Suspicious Fall from Glory
Milo was crushed in the public eye in less than 24 hours on Sunday night and Monday morning, 19 and 20 FEB2017.
A group called the Reagan Battalion published heavily edited excerpts from a year-old Youtube video making it look like Milo endorsed pedophilia. Jake Tapper of CNN shortly thereafter chastised CPAC for having invited so awful a man to speak at their rally, and Milo was promptly disinvited by CPAC. Hours later, Simon & Schuster cancelled the book deal. The next day in a press conference, Milo announced his resignation from Breitbart in order to protect the integrity of their work.
If you look at Milo as a dishonest leftist plant to discredit the right, why would they crush him when he was doing so well? Why not wait until after the CPAC speech so they could tar all of CPAC?
If you look at Milo as honest about who he is, then his is yet another scalp claimed by the establishment to stop Americans from noticing how much free speech and other rights they’ve lost over the last few decades.
Here’s where the takedown starts to stink. Jake Tapper was revealed in the Wikileaks emails to be in close coordination with the Democrats. His pouncing on CPAC was suspiciously quick. An anonymous journalist leak to 4chan early on Monday morning (look for ID: UQ3+mU2r in the thread) gave an inside scoop on the move and motives and that folks should expect a steady drumbeat of ‘Milo the pedophile’ and ‘Milo must be disinvited from CPAC.’ He also mentions journalists working to gather dirt to take down many other strong right figures like Ann Coulter, and even mentions Alex Jones of InfoWars as a whole other beast in their eyes. Hours later, CPAC caved and disinvited Milo.
Simon & Schuster strangely grew a conscience and apparently walked away from their quarter million dollar advance on a book that was the #1 Bestseller on Amazon before it was even released. Strange, given that they still list the controversial book about oral sex orgies, “Rainbow Party” in their catalog since it was commissioned by a Simon & Schuster editor in 2005, and still recommend it for 14 year olds to read. I knew some bookstore owners back when it came out and remember their shock and revulsion at the recommendation to shelve it in the kids’ section. How a business that is fine with trash like that would suddenly say no to all that money they were going to get via Milo (despite knowing about his personal vulgarity) baffles the mind.
And who is this “Reagan Battalion” that kicked off the whole event? The Daily Dot did some digging on this organization which appears to be a conservative news aggregator. They found ties to an independent presidential candidate in 2016 named Evan McMullin, from the NeverTrump movement, boasting of approval by the Reagan Battalion and ads from the Reagan Battalion promoting McMullin, though they deny any connection today. What’s more, the Reagan Battalion website contained links implicating it as a reformation of the Stop Donald Trump PAC which backed Rubio during the primaries, registered with the FEC by a leading Democrat activist, and their former website redirects to a page for a large Democrat grassroots activist group nicknamed as “The Tea Party of the Left.” But all those connections are formally denied.
As to Milo’s actual comments, in the full context they are not nearly as bad as the edited video made it seem, though they still embrace a level of depravity. Yet compared to a liberal darling like George Takei or Lena Dunham (please don’t click either link unless you have a strong stomach), Milo’s comments were positively milquetoast.
The Milo story is a lot to digest, I know. How does this point to an establishment? Because it is one recent and fresh example out of many possibilities (I’ll touch on a few more later) through which we see collusion (aka conspiracy) of supposedly independent media groups and the subjects they cover to push political agenda via GamerGate (echoed in several other entertainment and media fields), now being repeated again at the national level with collusion between mainstream media sources and politicians. We see NeverTrump elements who push supposedly conservative causes (like National Review and other “conservative” publications who were heavily critical of Trump) and candidates (like Rubio from the “Gang of 8”) teaming up with far left Democrat elements to destroy those like Milo who point to the crumbling American values and freedoms.
Establishment as an Evil Twin
To help get the point across, here’s a thought exercise for you. In the world of Christendom, there are many different factions of Christianity. There are some players of titanic size like the Roman Catholic Church, many players of moderate size like the Lutherans and the Southern Baptist Convention. And there are countless small players like all those dedicated but independent churches who do not answer to a formal authority structure.
It is easy enough to state that the Pope of the Roman Catholic church is one of the biggest movers and shakers in the world of Christendom. But just because an evangelical witnesses to a man waiting for an airplane, it does not mean that his actions were somehow directed by the Pope himself and are a key move in the Pope’s plan to make the world Christian (or Roman Catholic). It doesn’t even mean the evangelical answers to the Pope or gives the slightest thought to the Pope’s motives and desires.
So think of progressivism or globalism or leftism (Alt-Left) as an evil twin of Christianity. Many of its followers act with religious zeal. They even burn heretics (today called racists, or sexists, or homophobes) by doxxing them online, SWATting their house, and pestering their employer until the offender is unemployed and unemployable.
George Soros is likely one of the biggest players. In his league you also have men like Rockefeller, Rothschild, Ted Turner, and various billion-dollar corporate CEO’s who increasingly run their company more like a leftist PAC than a business (Amazon, Starbucks ‘wants to hire 10,000 refugees?, Facebook, Twitter, etc.)
Below that are various major and minor politicians, and at the very bottom all the everyday agitators who write fact-free newspaper columns or get paid to show up and protest some event or cause. Just because a bunch of journalists conspired to direct a false narrative in GamerGate or the Hugo award controversies or the coverage of Trump, doesn’t mean they answer directly to Soros or even know what he thinks. But does the sum action at the bottom rungs serve the goals of the top players? Certainly. Sometimes, the top players may have paid $33 million to terrorist organizations like Black Lives Matter, and sometimes they merely benefit from downstream effects as the mob pushes their religion of bigger government with a heaven-on-earth goal of one world government.
Ultimately, “establishment” consists of individuals or groups currently holding power over large numbers of people and are working to further grow and consolidate that power. Another case in point would the recent revelations on CIA Vault 7 (emphasis mine):
The agency’s hacking division freed it from having to disclose its often controversial operations to the NSA (its primary bureaucratic rival) in order to draw on the NSA’s hacking capacities.
… The CIA had created, in effect, its “own NSA” with even less accountability and without publicly answering the question as to whether such a massive budgetary spend on duplicating the capacities of a rival agency could be justified.
What we’re looking at as “Establishment” isn’t simply the powerful globalists or the “Deep State.” It is every individual and group working to grow the size and power of government and grow the size and power of the “Establishment.” It doesn’t matter if they are RINO or Democrat or a NeverTrump Conservative talking head or a lowly government bureaucrat trying to preserve his job and make it more important than it really is.
Part III: Establishment Gain from US Demise
Establishment Opposition to Democracy, Christianity, and Capitalism
[Editor’s Note 21MAR2017: We received some feedback that the 3 mentions of those of Jewish decent in the quotes and summary statements immediately below are anti-Semitic. Double-checking both the context and the primary sources, that is not the case. The quote context asks about and attempts to explain a paradoxical phenomena of leftist mindset using two easily observed examples: the rich leftist who works to oppose the capitalism that made him rich, and the secular/liberal/progressive Jew in America who supports pro-Palestine policy in America rather than a pro-Israel platform. For evidence that this is an observable phenomenon among some American Jews, consider this article from the Haaretz newspaper in Israel “American Jewish Support for Israel Is Eroding, and It’s Got Nothing to Do With the Palestinians“. Another example is from a pro-America/pro-Israel magazine co-founded by Elie Wiesel, which pulls together thoughts on the phenomenon from several dozen influential Jews of note: “The Growing Gap Between Israel and American Jews“. From the opposing viewpoint, here is a pro-Palestine publication on American policy which observes and attempts to explain the same phenomenon. Next, going back to our original primary source, John C Wright, it is found that he writes from a devout Roman Catholic perspective and opposes racism including anti-Semitism. While the foundations of his point of view may run contrary to our Protestant readers, we have highlighted and recommended only those points which appear fruitful for all true Americans and all true Christians, points important to him as well. Last, all writers for our site support the right of Israel to exist and defend itself as a nation and a people and we strongly disagree with any racist or anti-Semitic ideology.]
To understand establishment motives, we must understand some of the establishment mindset.
To that end I quote extensively from a political and philosophical article penned by the writer John C Wright. The entire essay is well worth a read to understand the enemy mindset, but we are skipping past most of the reasoning and looking at some concluding paragraphs. Wright’s “Unified Field Theory of Madness” opens thus:
Leftism is an enigma. We need a theorem that explains not one or two aspects of Leftism, but all their traits.
And, while we are at it, if we could also explain why the Rich, who are routinely vilified by the Left number among its most ardent supporters, or the secular Jews, our theory would be very potent in its explanatory power.
Why would folks like the rich or the secular Jews support a movement that demonizes them and destroys the routes they followed to attain success?
Jumping to section 8, the final section of the theory (emphases in bold are mine):
From the roots of the compassionate epistemology, which forbids them from holding any opinion based on judgment, we have seen how this flowers into to the judgments all opponents are evil, all lovely things hateful, no war is just, no independence of thought is to be tolerated, no success to go unpunished, and no truth to be admitted.
But what is the one thing the Rich, the Chosen or the Elite, blessed by so much, cannot get for love or money in a Christian Commonwealth, in a Free Market, or by vote in a Democracy?
They cannot get rank. They cannot get the imponderable pomp and honor and deference due to men of noble or high station paid to them by the lesser and inferior ranks.
For it is not just wealth, or race, or intellect that makes a man into the shriveled and whining destroyers I have here so tellingly described. It is a sense of being cheated.
You heard me. These pampered and privileged members of the elite feel that they are being robbed of their just due. Being elite is not enough. They want the lesser beings, the common men, the mob, the peasants, the underlings, to give them the honor and worship and adoration normally paid to a true and ruling aristocracy.
These people hate America, and everything for which she stands, and hate Christ, and everything for which He stands, with the bitter hatred of someone who has earned a high position and been cheated of it. Democracy does not give them what they want. God does not give them what they want.
Look at what Leftist political theory did in Russia and Red China once it was freed of all lingering doubts and checks and chains. Look at the piles of skulls. Then look at the Dachas and the larger-than-life monuments to the Beloved Leader.
They want to be aristocrats, in spirit if not in fact. They want to be born into privilege, and to be admired, without the tedium of actually doing anything to earn admiration, neither in the marketplace of the market, nor in the marketplace of ideas.
There is no paradox at all of rich man being committed to policies that will destroy the laws and customs needed to create wealth. The Middle Class creates most of the wealth, most of the jobs. Socialism requires cooperation between certain protected industries to be kept alive as neutered pets. Whether the rich bribe the powerful or the powerful extort wealth from the rich makes no matter: the end result is a partnership between the rich and powerful to trample the faces of the poor. That is the end result of the mindset described above, once it is free to act, and devoid of scruples. Imagine a boot stomping a human face forever.
Any proud man who feels the society has not given him his due will gradually grow more critical and impatient with it. Remember the hatred poured out upon the Middle Class, and our religion, and our morals, and our work ethic. Remember how we are accused, and accused, and accused of the very things we and we alone, across the ages, have cured or corrected or minimized, everything from pollution to racism to population outnumbering resources.
The reward of wealth is not enough for the rich socialist; the reward of freedom from racism not enough for the Jew who supports Palestinian bombers and hates the state of Israel; the reward of sinecure is not enough for the Ivory Tower professor. They see men who are self-reliant and happy and God-fearing who do not bow the knee to men who possess more, physical or intellectual possessions, than do they. They do not fear and love their superiors. That the ordinary working man, a father with a family, should be happy in his suburban home, and pay no honors and make no obeisance to the would-be elite in our elite-free society is intolerable.
They do not want our money. If they wanted money, they would not spend countless billions on boondoggles or flush it down ratholes. They do not want to rule us. If they wanted to rule, they would not be so absurdly incompetent when in power.
They want only to have the honors, like Princesses, not the duties of war and lawmaking, like Kings. In the final reckoning, when all is said and done, all these paradoxes can be explained by the simplest theory of all.
Leftism is the sin of pride disguised as compassion.
So, the elite establishment is driven by a sense that they are better than us, the common men. And is that not what we see with politicians and big businessmen who act as if they are above the law?
Ask any military man who’s held a security clearance (like myself) what would happen to him if he did even an iota of the things Hillary Clinton did with her private email server as Secretary of State. I personally know men whose careers were immediately ended by innocent mistakes at the lowest level of classified material handling, even though security nets in place prevented any actual loss or compromise of information. These were honest mistakes and not of any malice whatsoever.
Ask any small businessman what would happen if he conducted himself in the manner of some of the larger firms on Wall Street or the international banks. Sure, the big companies and big banks got fined (pennies on the dollars they stole), but in most cases no one went to jail. See for example, the case of HSBC openly laundering drug money for the cartels (originally reported by WND). While I hate to point to a source like Huffington Post, even they can see the lack of justice and accountability for those high up, if only because they condemn big business and cheer Occupy Wall Street while also cheering lawless politicians on the left, not realizing the problem is an alliance of lawless businessmen and lawless politicians of all stripes.
Consider also the case in which Congress knowingly and deliberately broke their own laws (by filing that the House and Senate each had a total of only 45 employees) in order to give themselves and their thousands of staff employees a break from ObamaCare which no citizen can receive. Tyrants!
When ObamaCare threw members of Congress and their staffs out of their health plans and socked them with a pay cut in the neighborhood of $12,000 each, Republican and Democratic members of Congress collaborated with President Obama to devise an illegal scheme to keep that money flowing. Members and staff are now the only federal employees who receive a taxpayer-funded Federal Employees Health Benefits Program premium contribution toward non-FEHBP plans.
The fact that members wanted to hold onto their $12,000 tax-free, taxpayer-financed premium contribution played only a small part in the bipartisan and near-unanimous support for this illegal scheme. The main reason member supported it was that if congressional staff took a $12,000 pay cut, there would have been an exodus from Capitol Hill.
And ObamaCare was perhaps the least popular law ever forced upon the American People despite their objections. It likely lead to the electoral “House cleaning” at mid-term elections by an outraged populace. And the “brain drain” that Capitol Hill was so desperate to prevent that they flouted the law as it applied to themselves and their enormous staff? Michael Wear gives us one example of those who would rule over us.
Michael Wear is a theologically conservative evangelical Christian who worked for Obama in the Democrat Party. He helped with faith-outreach strategies for Obama’s 2008 campaign and was director of Barack Obama’s 2012 faith-outreach efforts. In an interview with The Atlantic about his book, it is reported (emphasis mine):
Several years later [after 2008], he watched battles over abortion funding and contraception requirements in the Affordable Care Act with chagrin: The administration was unnecessarily antagonistic toward religious conservatives in both of those fights, Wear argues, and it eventually lost, anyway. When Louie Giglio, an evangelical pastor, was pressured to withdraw from giving the 2012 inaugural benediction because of his teachings on homosexuality, Wear almost quit.
Some of his colleagues also didn’t understand his work, he writes. He once drafted a faith-outreach fact sheet describing Obama’s views on poverty, titling it “Economic Fairness and the Least of These,” a reference to a famous teaching from Jesus in the Bible. Another staffer repeatedly deleted “the least of these,” commenting, “Is this a typo? It doesn’t make any sense to me. Who/what are ‘these’?”
As John Wright explained, they hate Christianity, they hate Democracy, and they hate the Free Market because all three systems only recognize a man based on his merits, while the various levels of establishment elite feel they have been cheated out of being praised as inherently superior to the rest of us. And those who would rule over us don’t even understand some of the most basic references from core literature of Western Civilization (more on that later).
Tearing Down Civilization
Another political/philosophical article from John C Wright works through the ideological stones of civilization and how a nation convinces itself to dear down its own civilizational foundations. Definitely go read the whole thing.
A civilization whose citizens have lost the ability to admire its virtues, beauties, benefits and strengths is one whose citizens are losing the ability to defend that civilization. Before we pull stone from stone to dismantle the wall that separates civilized life from the chaotic bloodshed, cruelty, and misery of barbarism outside, it behooves us to examine the wall, and ask three questions of it: What is Civilization? How is it maintained? What can undo it?
Summarizing a bit, without the laws of civilization all labor is vain because anything you build or develop can be seized from you by force. But even barbarians tend to honor the ties of family so as not to live in total anarchy. Thus, the first stone of civilization is protection of the family unit. The capstone is when the intellectuals convince the King that due to a higher law, the King is not above the laws of the land.
Safety from constant attack allows differentiation of labor into basic groups:
- The king and his fighting men
- The priests: “whoever or whatever it is to whom you entrusted your common intellectual and spiritual heritage, such as your academics, media, singers of songs and tellers of tales, the press and philosophers”
- The merchant class
- The peasant class
Here is how the bulwark of civilization is torn down, as related by Wright. See how far America has pushed itself today:
- The clerks or intellectuals undermine the idea that the King is NOT above the law. This begins with the philosophers teach that truth is relative and words are meaningless. [Allan Bloom identified this as a lead trait of new (and far less intelligent) college students back in the 1980’s.]
- The press abandons objective reporting and makes the philosophers’ lies into actuality by practice and only reporting spun lies. [This one is becoming more plain by the day with all the fake news in the mainstream media.]
- The singers change from songs of beauty to songs about evil and ugly things. The storytellers always depict the civilization as worthless, wicked, hypocritical, and vile, so that the people know only disgust for their own civilization. [You may screen movies for your kids for profanity, violence, and indecency. But do you notice all the subversive messages? Dads portrayed as buffoons and idiots who need a tween girl to show him how its done. Kids encouraged to ignore elders in their community and go follow their heart. A theme that ‘the evil is not as bad as you thought, but the good is worse than you imagined.’]
- Lastly, the philosophers at this point need only suggest the wall of civilization be torn down to reach an Utopian paradise on the other side. The King “must be granted a plethora of unlawful powers in the name of breaking down the wall blocking the way to Utopia.” [Liberals now panicked that Trump has a phone and a pen and can undo every executive order that was not a law out of congress fail to realize if that power scares them, perhaps no man in America should have it.]
- The King (or whoever is chief of enforcing law in the land) destroys the sense of honor among his fighting men (those who defend the land and enforce the law, i.e. the police and military and all civil servants). The police become militarized and the opponents of the people, the military becomes neutered and perverse. The civil servants are corrupted and selectively follow law in each of their own areas they oversee.
- The merchants and middle class who are the economic powerhouse are quickly corrupted because there can no longer be faith in fair enforcement of contracts. Some make favoritism deals with the king, creating crony capitalism. Industries become property of the state.
- Last, the family is torn apart through perverse and unequal family laws. Men are set against women, husbands against wives, and parents against children.
- Civilization is gone and anarchy reigns. Might makes right is now the only law of the land, and the elite who pushed this destruction tend to have many resources to make themselves mighty.
One last item to highlight is the attack on beauty, linked in the quote from Wright above. The ugliness of modern art and the upsetting of cultural norms coming from all our centers of art and media contribute thus to destroying civilization:
…if beauty is not merely in the eye of the beholder, then beauty tells us what is a truth, a real truth, a truth from a world beyond the world of petty propaganda, a beauty beyond the world of pornography…if beauty is not merely in the eye of the beholder, then beauty is meant to be served, not used for your selfish pleasures. Beauty humbles the proud, for it shows them something beyond themselves and their appetites.
…Go into a modern art museum: look at the urinal, the severed cow head, the can of shit, the soiled bed. These are not the expressions of one or two aberrant individuals with psychological problems: this is the condition of our culture for nearly a century, an industry involving endless amounts of money public and private. This is the leadership of the artistic vision controlling our civilization…
To what end? (italics emphasis mine):
Imagine two men: one stands in a bright house, tall with marble columns adorned with lavish art, splendid with shining glass images of saints and heroes, mementos of great sorrow and great victories both past and promised. A polyphonic choir raises their voices in golden song, singing an ode to joy. The other stands in a slum with peeling wallpaper, or a roofless ruin infested with rats, hemmed by feces-splashed gray concrete walls lurid with jagged graffiti, chalked with swearwords and flickering neon signs advertising strip joints. Rap music thuds nearby, ear-splitting, yowling obscenities. A bureaucrat approaches each man and orders him to do some routine and routinely humiliating task, such as pee in a cup to be drug tested, or be fingerprinted, or suffer an anal cavity search, or surrender his weapons, or his money, or his name. Which of the two men is more likely to take a stand on principle not to submit?
Which one will automatically and unconsciously assume that human life is sacred, human rights are sacrosanct, and that Man is made in the image and likeness of God? The man surrounded by godlike images? Or the man surrounded by mocking filth?
In other words, the attack on objective beauty serves to blind us to the thought that there are higher principles worth dying for, and instead to submit and just do whatever we are told.
Part IV: The Internal Destruction of the United States?
Communist Takeover = Progressive Alt left agenda…do these goals sound familiar? If so, it’s because the same root ideology underlies all tyrannical attempts to wield absolute power over other people’s daily lives.
Here’s a picture from 1937, typical of that time despite the Great Depression (source):
It’s part of a series of about a dozen photos on this family, part of a larger government project from that time. Notice a few things:
- He’s a hired hand, yet he owns his own farm and has time to work it and maintain it.
- He has nine children. Those in the photos all appear healthy, happy, and well cared for.
- While the décor is not lavish, it is not nearly as bad as recession-stricken areas today like Camden, New Jersey.
- This man can afford to be a sole bread-winner providing for a wife and nine children, and he’s not some elite banker or business executive.
- In this era, this man was the respected head of his household.
In America today, few families own their own home, let alone a productive piece of land which can give them a supplemental income or feed their families. Dual income is a must for most families, and mothers rarely have the luxury anymore of raising their own children at home. Parents rarely marry, and out-of-wedlock births are normalized. Families are treated as irresponsible or careless if they have more than 2.1 children. And for Valentines Day in America in 2017, the NYT actually ran a serious op-ed titled “Husbands are Deadlier than Terrorists” stating the following:
Above all, fear spouses: Husbands are incomparably more deadly in America than jihadist terrorists.
And husbands are so deadly in part because in America they have ready access to firearms, even when they have a history of violence. In other countries, brutish husbands put wives in hospitals; in America, they put them in graves.
As for the décor of Tip Estes’s home being not too shabby, consider the disintegration of Camden, NJ.
Here’s a few samples, but go look at the whole set.
And on the subject of the success of blacks, how have their lives changed as the Elite agenda has unfolded using them as pawns?
Is this the behavior that Martin Luther King would have wished from young black men in his time? Would he be embarrassed and ashamed of this disrespect for the country and terrorism committed by America’s black youth?
I actually know a liberal who had the job of overseeing childcare for the big Bernie Sanders rally in Seattle that was interrupted by BLM. She later reported to acquaintances the fear and horror as she and other workers barred and held the door while BLM activists pounded on the door and demanded that “all those white children be turned over so that they can get what’s coming to them.” Yet she still says she does not oppose BLM. In hindsight, she cannot connect the dots, and really thinks that if only they better understood how “not-racist” the Bernie supporters are, maybe BLM wouldn’t have acted that way.
If Black Lives actually mattered to blacks, then why is there so much black on black crime and are they being used by the Alt-Left? When will the black community begin the narrative and seek the truth about how the Elite (CIA) introduced drugs and abortion into their communities to keep them oppressed? Wait, why doesn’t the Alt-Left media report about this? The answer! Because they are the Elite Racists! They use and exploit ALL people of color to meet their sick agenda and then dump them in the gutter when they are done with them, leaving these good people in worse conditions than when they started.
Don’t believe blacks are target by the Elite for mass murder and political gain? Then take these next two pictures into consideration, do your own investigation and call me in the morning!
Hitler Was Pro-Choice
In 1933, when the Nazi’s came to power, the law was changed to legalize abortion and make this a matter of decision for a medical review board. The development of Germany’s abortion policy was left to the county’s most vociferous abortion advocacy group, the Berlin Chamber of Physicians. This group, which advocated abortion on demand, determined that “The health of the mother – considered from all angles – is the decisive factor.” Then, just as now, health of the mother criterion was loosely understood to mean any economic or psychological affect on the woman’s total well being.
There were approximately 500,000 abortions annually in Germany under the Third Reich, a country of 60 to 70 million people. And, in Nazi Germany, racial stock was considered an aspect of the health of the mother. If she was from an “unhealthy” race, such as Polish, Czech or Jewish, then she was often forced to have an abortion against her will. However, race wasn’t the only consideration. Hitler actively promoted the destruction of the crippled, poor and unemployed classes, as did Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood. Abortion led to forced sterilization, which led to “euthanasia,” which led to Auschwitz.
What did Obama do for the diverse population of America? NOTHING. Period. He is part of the Elite, he doesn’t give a damn about black people.
Why can’t blacks be affluent like the picture of Camden in 1951? They can be if they stop watching the Fake News being controlled by Soros and break away from the paradigm of enslavement that the Elite have woven into their society. The Elite hate them. That’s the TRUTH!
Part V: How’s American civilization looking now?
Establishment trait: Depopulation
There are a few more common traits observed again and again, now and across the ages, in those who would rule over those they consider inferior.
First is a goal of depopulation. This may be to protect ‘Mother Earth’ whom they worship as a goddess in all but title, or perhaps a simple pragmatic calculation to lessen the amount of “them” in an “us vs. them” situation. The 1% can be toppled by the 99% by sheer force of numbers, so reducing the number of the masses makes them more compliant and manageable.
Consider the Georgia Guidestones. Six slabs of granite standing 20 feet tall, erected in Georgia in 1980, commissioned by unknown anonymous persons. They have occasionally been defaced by those objecting to a New World Order, and the site is still maintained today, now with security cameras to prosecute vandals. Ten rules for a coming “Age of Reason” are engraved in eight languages.
Item number 1 – reduce the world population below 500 million and keep it there. That means execution of almost 95% of all human beings on the planet.
Note also the emphases on controlling reproduction and fertility, holding man’s [fallible] reasoning as supreme, uniting under one world language and one world court, and praise for the earth and nature.
But it’s just some weird and lonely monument, right?
On the approaching occasion of 31OCT2011, which the UN designated as the day when global population would hit 7 billion people, one writer gathered quotes from many influential leaders around the world because the population news was seen as cause for alarm rather than celebration. Take a minute and read the whole thing, since it is almost entirely one quote after another.
Ted Turner thinks eliminating 95% of the global population would be ideal. Mikhall Gorbachev is more merciful and thinks only 90% of humanity needs to be eliminated. Al Gore is all in favor of taking control of everyone else’s fertility to prevent reproduction and reduce population. The UN is actively brainstorming ideas to reduce fertility in developing countries. Thomas Friedman jumps on the depopulation bandwagon too. Obama’s science advisor John Holdren went into some detail on how to forcibly sterilize most of the population, and how it would be totally constitutional. Bill Gates wants to slash global population by 10-15%. US Supreme Court Justice Ginsberg thinks population ought to be reduced, but only in the undesirable population groups. Her comment, reflecting on Roe v Wade, is right on board with Margret Sanger’s goals of eugenics and founding Planned Parenthood to specifically reduce black reproduction, a goal which has wildly succeeded. David Rockefeller also supports depopulation, as does Prince Phillip. And then there are a plethora of academics and intelligentsia all discussing the need for reducing population and reducing fertility and how those in control might go about accomplishing it.
It is fitting to reflect on the quote by psychiatrist and neurologist Viktor Frankl, who after surviving four Nazi concentration camps including Auschwitz later wrote (in his book The Doctor and The Soul):
I am absolutely convinced that the gas chambers of Auschwitz, Treblinka, and Maidanek were ultimately prepared not in some Ministry or other in Berlin, but rather at the desks and lecture halls of nihilistic scientists and philosophers.
Note again that in the elite depopulation quotes and in Frankl’s opinion, these ideas flow from intellectuals to those who hold power, just as John C Wright suggested above.
In another example, here is an interview from the early 1980’s with Larry Grathwohl who infiltrated the domestic terrorist group the Weather Underground, which had Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn as leading figures – the same two men who have been heavily involved in Obama’s rise to the Presidency.
Grathwohl explains how at a top leadership meeting of the group, they discussed the plan to overthrow the USA and how it would most likely entail re-education camps and the necessity of executing at least 10% of the US population who likely would refuse re-education. Again we see those who would rule us coldly discussing the necessity of executing millions upon millions of their own countrymen.
Another example of depopulation for political or power-amassing ends is tabulated in The Irrational Atheist (pp. 240-241), which counts up that there have been 28 godless nations in history with avowed atheists at the helm from the First French Republic to 2008. In all, these 28 regimes nations have been led by 89 atheists. Counting only those who killed at least 5000 of their own people, the odds work out that there is a 58% chance that a godless man in power will murder mass numbers of his own people. Reaching back to the civilization quotes from John C Wright, the point is that if a nation’s leader is not restrained by recognition of some higher power, then odds are more likely than not that mass depopulation will be implemented.
While Western Civilization of the 21st century has not yet entered an active phase of depopulation, there are many ways it is being indirectly accomplished. Here is an interesting list from a hedonist turned political philosopher:
Here is a short list of progressive causes that have percolated from intellectuals and later sponsored or hijacked by billionaire activists and major government institutions of the West.
1. Abortion is a bodily “choice,” not human murder. Result: it decreases population.
2. Birth control is a “choice” that allows women to better practice consumer lifestyles. Result: it decreases population.
3. Female empowerment in the form of feminism and egalitarianism pushes women into corporate work with the goal of delaying motherhood (or eliminating it outright). Result: it decreases reproduction and family formation.
4. Promotion of sterile human relationships in the form of homosexuality and transsexuality can’t possibly result in the creation of life. Result: it decreases population, reproduction, and traditional family formation.
5. Promotion of atheism, nihilism, individualism, and consumerism as suitable alternatives to traditional living via nuclear family units. Result: it decreases reproduction and traditional family formation.
6. The needs of the “environment” must be served before that of living humans. Result: it makes human guilty of family formation.
7. Massive waves of foreign immigrants are encouraged entry into Western nations to break bonds between tribe and neighbor that decrease notions of nationalism and patriotism while transferring fertility and economic resources from native people to foreigners. Result: it decreases relative population of native citizens.
All of the above decreases the reproductive rate, either directly through the killing of life, or indirectly by promoting guilt and alternative lifestyles that are incompatible with the creation of life. At the same time, immigrant populations are allowed to grow at a faster rate that the natives’ ability to reproduce.
Those who rule over us don’t need more Americans or European-derived people to cement their power and wealth within nations they control through government institutions and transnational organizations and corporations. How would it benefit them if a baby boom takes place among those from American conservative states that believe in the first and second amendments?
If that note about foreign immigrants seems offensive, you might take it up with John Podesta, who’s leaked emails on wikileaks include a discussion of hiding some of the connections in a correction on a 2008 power point with the following slide:
Building a Permanent Progressive Majority
1.Create the conditions for a tidal wave against the right wing.
2.Keep the President’s numbers down and brand all conservative candidates as “Bush Republicans.”
3.Ensure that demographics is destiny.
4.Control the political discourse.
5.Set the stage for future progressive actions.
6.Leave something behind.
The Democrats push big government and know that third world immigrants reliably vote for more government control. We see it in the USA easily enough in the “Californication” effect when California residents flee the problems of their state, only to thoughtlessly vote in a new state for the same policies that ruined their home state.
Here also is an article analyzing this effect in California. And here is a news article about Democrats looking at California as a success and applying the same methods to Virginia to make it permanently a Democrat stronghold.
Establishment Traits: Occultism and Perversion
Another shocking find in the Podesta email dump is an invite from Marina Abramovic to Podesta’s brother for a “Spirit Cooking” and asking if John Podesta would be joining them. For those who hadn’t heard, “Spirit Cooking” is one of Abromovic’s unique bits of performance art using a mix of blood, semen, urine, and breast milk for various things, whether eating or splashing on a child-sized statue.
This link explains quite a bit (with photos and documentation) about the connections between Clinton, Podesta, Abramovic, and the strange things they do in their free time. I highly recommend giving it a look. It is not NSFW, but you’ll need a strong stomach. A mainstream news article covers one of the same bizarre banquet pieces I would have considered NSFW, but I guess there’s no ‘must be 18’ warnings because, hey, it’s art and it’s for charity.
From the article:
Gaga arrived with performance artist Marina Abramovic and the center’s director Robert Wilson then mingled with stars like
Hugh Jackman and Winona Ryder.
‘There was a casket with a totally naked woman laying in what looked like a pool of blood.’
‘On a table nearby there was a row of little spoons — no one had touched them, because no one knew what they were for. [Wilson] gave two spoons to Gaga and Marina . . . and Gaga dipped the spoon right between the artist’s legs, and took a sip.’
She then, ‘proceeded to lick the spoon.’
But it’s just art right?
First, there’s something seriously wrong with anyone who walks up to tables like these and digs in like it’s cute or normal.
Second, on an “Ask Me Anything” Reddit, Abramovic answered a user question about the occult in art:
Speaking of art, Tony Podesta, lobbyist and brother of John Podesta who had the Spirit Cooking invite, fancies this to decorate his living room:
These examples of “art” (using the term extremely loosely) point back again to John C Wright’s point about beauty versus ugliness. Is this the type of art which reminds a man that human life is sacred, human rights are sacrosanct, and that Man is made in the image and likeness of God? Or is this the type of “art” that reminds man
The Swamp Gets Deeper
The Podesta email leak contained some truly bizarre messages about pizza and other fun foods.
“I consider ice cream, its purchase, and its consumption a rather serious business. We can’t just willy-nilly toss it out and about in casual references, especially linked with the word ‘free’.”
“Lo and behold, instead of pasta and wonderful sauces, it was a lovely, tempting assortment of cheeses, Yummy. I am awaiting the return of my children and grandchildren from their holiday travels so that we can demolish them.”
“Do you think I’ll do better playing dominos on cheese than on pasta?”
“Hi John, The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related.) Is it yours? They can send it if you want. I know you’re busy, so feel free not to respond if it’s not yours or you don’t want it.”
That’s not the lot of them, just some of the stranger ones. The seriousness of ice cream and that it must not be free? Playing dominos on cheese or on pasta? A pizza-related map on a handkerchief?
This stuff is weird language which doesn’t even make sense…until you go to common pedophile code words (take another look at the emails with these in mind):
“hotdog” = boy
“pizza” = girl
“cheese” = little girl
“pasta” = little boy
“ice cream” = male prostitute
“walnut” = person of color
“map” = semen
“sauce” = orgy
Isn’t this just a big coincidence? I mean, any of us ordinary folk might talk about pizza and ice cream in our email, but that doesn’t mean we are child predators.
At the center of the Podesta emails about pizza is a DC pizzeria called Comet Ping Pong. It hails itself as a “family friendly” place and hosts sleepovers for kids. But then they also bring in a band called Heavy Breathing whose performance is loaded with open joking about pedophilia, and suggestive and erotic material is circulated in reference to the business, even by its owner. For example, here is a montage of some of the images dug up:
All of this gut-churning weirdness from the Podesta emails has been labeled as Pizzagate, and the mainstream media ever since has been repeating that it is truly fake news. Google pushes sites to the top which “debunk” Pizzagate. I read several (such as Snopes) to consider arguments against, and they might as well have been reading from the CIA conspiracy theory playbook.
- “The guy implicated says it’s all false, therefore it is all false.” How often does someone own up to wrongdoing, especially these days? Sure, someone accused of something would deny it. That doesn’t make him guilty. But telling it as if the implicated person’s denial is the final word on the matter is an attempt to prevent further questioning.
- “There have been no arrests or charges brought, therefore the evidence is wholly lacking.” I’ve read court cases of child abuse rings where all charges were dropped due to statute of limitations, and those implicated celebrate by making statements that they were exonerated. On the contrary, the evidence was never considered and was instead thrown out on a technicality without consideration. Another exception would be all the times where investigations of powerful people were obstructed by the government or police forces. A lack of charges or arrests is reason to look closer at the evidence and see if it is indeed lacking. It is definitely not the end of the story. Any attempt to make it so is an attempt to stop further questioning.
Taking a look at some sites which try to highlight or correlate the problems which the common people see in this, I’ve selected a few which are more solidly informative and stay away from baseless speculation.
- This article from Daily Sheeple shows many images with sources, with brief explanatory interjection, taking the reader from the mundane to the truly disturbing with the Podesta connections. It’s a decent place to start opening the can of worms on what’s been found.
- This wiki does a good job of organizing all the larger connections to pedophile rings implicated at high levels of US government, and provides a helpful chronology to organize over a decade of extremely concerning events, all with good sourcing so you can check for yourself.
- Here’s a well sourced article which highlights how the crimes Pizzagate hints at are quite common and documented, and how as soon as citizens began asking about Pizzagate the Press and the Deep State began pushing the theme of Russian interference in American politics.
- Another article from the same site above captures quite a bit of the questionable images around Comet Ping Pong Pizza, and documents how any investigation of it has been buried by the mainstream.
But its not just the USA.
- This article discusses the recent Norway Pedophile Ring bust, which included several of their politicians. Strangely, coverage of this major bust has been scrubbed from most Mainstream Media sites which initially reported on it.
- An article discussing the coverup of a political pedophile ring under Margret Thatcher.
- Another ring in Britain, implicating: “out of 1,433 alleged offenders 76 were politicians, 43 were from music industry and 135 were from TV, film or radio”
- Elijah Wood and Corey Feldmen blowing the whistle on such rings in Hollywood.
- Here’s another which pulls together almost a dozen such rings, half in the USA.
- Dennis Hastert, longest serving Speaker of the House in the USA, served only 15 months for his conviction of serial child predation due to expiry of the statue of limitations.
- A British Prime Minister from 1970-1974 convicted after the cover-up fell apart.
- A government cover-up in Cleveland of 70 pedophile cases, sweeping confessions under the rug.
Podesta / Soros / Clinton / VATICAN Connection
More surprises in the Podesta emails which are not talked about by any of the groups I’ve mentioned above, but were highlighted by Roman Catholics upset with the latest Pope.
Part of the Podesta emails show a $650k Soros grant to an activist group connected with Black Lives Matter. The particular email is a progress report to Podesta stating that 3 days of intensive meetings went well and the Vatican would be taking the talking point recommendations for the Pope’s upcoming visit to the US during the buildup to the Presidential Election.
Here’s an article with a pretty good summary and citations. Key quotes as follows:
The PICO Vatican meeting was not simply a brisk cursory papal meet and greet. Rather, documents reveal that Alinsky activists were invited, welcomed, and dined in intense strategy sessions with high level Vatican cardinals. The leaked emails expose the leftist political machinations behind the Francis papacy, where the Soros-funded community organizers coordinated radical messaging with high level papal cardinal confidantes.
Pope Francis shares Soros’ world view: climate change, mass migration, income inequality, globalism, and capitalism bashing.
The WikiLeaks Podesta emails reveal that the Vatican solicited advice from, and collaborated with leftist community organizers to advance the political platform of the Democratic party. Soros strategically funded PICO progressive activists who appear to serve as de facto advance men for the upcoming Pope’s U.S. trip, by discussing papal site visits and political messaging with key Vatican hierarchy.
The Soros marching orders for the PICO delegation was to hatch, implement, and coordinate Pope Francis’ strategic themes and events during his U.S. visit in September 2015. The Vatican agreed to position the Pope’s message in alignment with the Soros funded Alinskyites’ radical agenda.
Definitely go and read the whole thing.
What else is going on at the Vatican? It is apparently adopting the thinking of Paul Ehrlich whole-hog about the importance of DEPOPULATING the earth. (There’s that establishment theme on Depopulation again.)
Also, though the Roman Catholic Church is historically known for one of the most rigid stances on sexual relations (no homosexuality, no adultery, no abortion, no birth control) the new Pope appears to be shaking that up as well with his appointments and approvals. Take a look at this:
“The archbishop now at the helm of the Pontifical Academy for Life paid a homosexual artist to paint a blasphemous homoerotic mural in his cathedral church in 2007. The mural includes an image of the archbishop himself.
…Bishop Paglia, along with one Fr. Fabio Leonardis, oversaw every detail of Cinalli’s work, according to Cinalli, who approvingly notes that Paglia never asked him if he believed in the Christian doctrine of salvation.
Go read the article to see all the screen captures of what now passes for church art today. Michelangelo may have painted nudes, but you’ll notice a distinct difference in tastefulness and the message portrayed. Comparing the two is a finer illustration of John C Wright’s point about beauty that leads one to think of loftier matters, versus images which portray ugliness.
The article goes on to explain that once installed as the head of the Pontifical Academy for Life he approved a new sex-ed program so disturbing that one psychiatrist paid by the Vatican to counsel their predator priests and the victims of those priests over the last 40 years responded saying that whoever approved the curriculum needs to be put through the predatory priest counseling program.
The Bishop who loves his homoerotic mural then went on to revise the membership requirements for the Academy for Life so that members need no longer be committed to the Church’s teachings on upholding life, nor do they even need be Catholics anymore. None of the current members saw the change, because they had been appointed for life, until the Bishop terminated all memberships and purged the entire organization except for himself and his staff.
All of this had to be approved by the Pope, who meanwhile was turning a deaf ear to child victims of priestly abuse, despite having said he’d be cracking down on it.
Pulling everything together so far, here’s the key takeaways:
- Think of the establishment as “those who would rule over us” whether it’s a billionaire globalist with his fingers in every pie or a low-rung bureaucrat who wants to dictate how we live our lives. They work to preserve and expand the existing bureaucracy.
- Establishment types tend to operate from a position of jilted pride in which they want to be recognized as inherently better than everyone else, something they cannot ever obtain in a Democratic, Christian, Capitalist setting like America or Western World. Thus, they seek to tear down our civilization.
- They often push for a globalist agenda (to destroy local values) and a progressive agenda (to destroy traditional values).
- They tend to congregate around themes of the importance of Depopulating the Earth, Occultism (either a true belief seeking to gain unnatural power, or a desensitized morality seeing such things as cute entertainment), and Perversion (especially preying on children)
- The reach of this establishment and their behaviors can be seen in hidden connections (conspiracy by definition, revealed by email leaks) and often involves political and power figures all the way to the top of multiple governments and religious organizations.
Part VI: How Trump Stops Establishment Goals
Trump is a problem for the establishment in two primary ways. Connected to the swamp of perversion and occultism described above, his threats to drain the swamp might tear down both the careers of many powerful people and leverage others have over those compromised people.
Second, Trump has advanced on a platform of nationalism, which diametrically opposes moves toward globalism. Advances in the nationalist direction, whether America for Americans First or France for Frenchmen First or Germany for Germans first, all are steps backwards for a globalist agenda.
Draining the Swamp
The recent key interview that highlights the threat Trump can actually pose to the DC swamp comes from this leak from a DHS insider. Check out the whole interview, but here are some illuminating quotes:
Q. So it seems like the intel community has it in for Trump. How can he protect himself?
A. Trump has a tremendous opportunity here, but needs to circle wagons. The travel ban included 7 countries chosen by both Jared Kushner and Rudy. Why did it not include Saudi Arabia, or Pakistan, or Turkey or other countries that hate us? The seven nations mentioned were chosen by Israel, that’s why. And the unspoken alliance of Israel and Saudi Arabia should be exposed. They are brother and sister. Jared Kushner needs to be careful with what he says and to whom. But, the biggest thing Trump can do is expose PedoGate via Sessions. Big names will go down hard, and it gets the blood suckers drained from the swamp. There are as many pedophiles on the Republican side as there is with democrats, but Trump is in a unique position to truly “clean up Dodge”, so to speak. I can tell you that what is in Anthony Weiner’s hard drive, and what videos exist via Jeffery Epstein, WILL BRING massive arrests – in time. Trump’s legacy could be truly great if he was to purge the CIA, stop the extortion, prosecute the pedophiles and reinstate the death penalty for pedo’s convicted a second time. Pedogate is his path to greatness.
Q. You mention the word extort. Does that relate to Pizzagate?
A. PedoGate is only a modern term associated with a long history of Pedo-blackmail connected to both Israel and the Intel community. There is a full court press to stop PedoGate from being looked at because if people knew the true motives behind the pedophilia epidemic, they would do more than march on Washington. They could actually seed a revolution, with the spark coming from decent American parents who want to protect their kids. Our politicians are compromised. The senior analyst nicknamed “FBI Anon” alluded to this in his exchange with folks on 4chan and with you.
Q. What do you mean compromised?
A. Do you notice 2 central themes running through the MSM lately? Those themes are “Fear the Russians” and “#PizzaGate is fake news“. Both tropes come from the same place.
Q. So PedoGate is real and “they” have to get Americans to disbelieve it?
A. Let me explain how threatening PedoGate is… Who wins? Trump. Putin. Americans. Russians. The world…. Who loses? Israel, since they no longer can blackmail our politicians, the same goes for the CIA. The Shadow Government loses. But, the people win.
Q. Can you give me specific instances of politicians being compromised by Israel?
A. Sure. Lolita Island. Jeffery Epstein, a billionaire convicted of pedophilia received a soft sentence. His island was rigged with video recorders. Many politicians have been compromised. It was a Mossad/CIA operation. Contact ex-senior CIA CCS, Robert David Steele. Bob knows and has even spoken about this with numerous reporters.
Q. So an ex-CIA senior agent named Robert Steele is on record saying Epstein’s island was a honey trap to lure our most powerful politicians into a extortion scheme?
A. Yes. There are videos of some of the most powerful players in the most humiliating positions. If this gets out, not only are the politicians ruined, but the extortion game is over and suddenly, the influence CIA and Mossad wield over Washington, is gone.
When FBI anon leaked in early July, the whole idea was to expose the Clinton Foundation, and to hint at the sale of “people” i.e. Pedogate. Look back at his exchange on 4chan. He is a gifted analyst, and knows just what stone to throw at Goliath’s noggin. By triggering the shadow Government, he helps citizen journalists ask the right questions and follow the right breadcrumbs, not the rabbit holes the Elite scum want you to follow.
Now, PedoGate victims are speaking out on their experiences! You just had a story on some lady who went through having her family abused by California-Deep-State-sponsored terrorism. If folks knew that CPS in California is tied into a huge racket that kidnaps children from parents, they would realize just how sick this is. Foster homes, CPS, etc… all get paid well to jail parents and then snatch their kids away. These kids suffer abuse, and perpetuate the growing cancer called pedogate. Politicians who have pedophile tendencies are groomed for power, because they can be later extorted and controlled. Meanwhile, victims have no voice- until now. Suddenly, we have citizen journalism, and it will end up saving the people, in the end.
To summarize some key points from this interview:
- Actions from Trump and Putin both frustrate CIA/Mossad actions in the Middle East.
- CIA/Mossad used things like Epstein’s island to gather footage of politicians doing horrific things like sexually abusing children, and thus exert leverage over the politicians to follow the plan.
- Roughly 1/3 of US politicians are implicated on both sides of the political aisle.
- Leaks to lead citizen journalists to look in the right places are coming from Trump supporters in the FBI and ex-CIA agents who oppose the shadow government.
- If citizens could learn the whole truth, the establishment fears an outright revolution in America.
- “Pizzagate is fake news” and “Russian interference in America” are two themes being pushed by the establishment to try and cover it all up.
This is why I dragged you through all the bizarre Podesta connections. Widespread pedophile activity among those in power in addition with other weirdness which most common men would harshly reject has grown to a point across the USA and other Western nations that the secrets are leaking badly and cover-ups don’t cut it anymore. Records of the perversion provided leverage and power over degenerates in positions of power. If it gets blown open then ordinary citizens will find out that a substantial portion of those who would rule them are moral degenerates to whom most men would never submit. The proportion of degeneracy to decency in the circles of power is such that it may well result in open revolt of the populace.
The same interview above also highlights problems in the “Russian interference” angle, revealed by the attack on General Flynn as a member of Trump’s cabinet. The DHS insider explains:
Q. Ok, FBI anon gave Schumers initials, and Barnet Frank and others, but so far we have only seen low level arrests.
A . FBI anon did a “bank shot”. That’s a pool hall term we use. Ask Bob about it. FBI Anon rattled their cages as other DHS and local authorities rounded up all sorts of street-level human traffickers. The big arrests will come in time, but first the small fish are interrogated, and provide information that leads to larger fish. FBI Anon was firing a shot across the bow, much like you shake a beehive to infuriate the bees. Notice how blatantly hostile McCain, Schumer, Graham, and others are? It was what we call a “targeted trigger“.
It worked. By long-kniving Flynn, they exposed their hand. Now, Trump has full executive powers to investigate the CIA and Mossad. Notice how there is sound and fury about “Russian influence” and utter silence on “Mossad” influence in our power structure?
Why would Flynn be the subject of an investigation by the FBI and the Justice Department?
We are told that the FBI was monitoring the phone calls of Russian ambassador Kislyak under FISA. Makes sense — he’s an overt foreign agent from a hostile government. Flynn called Kislyak on December 29, 2016. It was not a nefarious communication: Flynn was a top adviser of then-president-elect Trump, a part of the Trump transition team, and just three weeks from formally becoming the new president’s national-security adviser. His communications with Kislyak were just some of the many conversations Flynn was having with foreign officials.The call to Kislyak, of course, was intercepted. No doubt the calls of other American officials who have perfectly valid reasons to call Russian diplomats have been intercepted. It is the FBI’s scrupulous practice to keep the identities of such interceptees confidential. So why single Flynn out for identification, and for investigation? FBI agents did not need to “grill” Flynn in order to learn about the call — they had a recording of the call.They also knew there was nothing untoward about the call. We know that from the Times report — a report that suggests an unseemly conjoining of investigative power to partisan politics. The report informs us that as the FBI set its sights on Flynn, its agents were consulting with “Obama advisers.” Interesting, no? Ever since Hillary Clinton’s loss to Donald Trump on November 8, Obama’s Democratic party had been pushing a narrative that “Putin hacked the election.”…So how come the FBI got involved here?Is the FBI saying that Mike Flynn is an agent of a foreign power? A covert Russian operative? That would be absurd. As I’ve detailed, Flynn is on record — unambiguously, in the core theme in his bestselling book — urging Americans to view Russia as an implacable enemy of the United States that must be checked.…Flynn is not a foreign agent.And there was no need to “grill” him over the contents of a conversation of which the FBI and Justice Department already had a recording.And the FBI has no business probing the veracity of public statements made by presidential administrations for political purposes — something it certainly resisted doing during the Obama administration.There appears to have been no foreign-intelligence or criminal-investigative purpose served by the FBI’s interrogation of General Flynn.
Interestingly, InfoWars interviewed the above-mentioned ex-CIA agent Robert Steele, who confirms that part of Flynn’s ousting was over the list of powerful and political pedophiles in DC, one of whom is the best friend of VP Pence.
Steele highlights three different groups working to stop or eliminate Trump:
- The globalists such as Soros, combined with the Democrat Party
- The Republican establishment
- The Deep State, including 500 high level individuals who for various reasons have chosen to betray America and work to destroy it.
How many times must the same lines of evidence converge before we hear it?
Part VII: Nationalism vs. Mass Immigration
I began to touch briefly on the immigration issue above in relation to the Podesta emails. The key phrase in “Building a Permanent Progressive Majority” was the strategic goal:
# 3 Ensure that demographics is destiny (from “Building a Permanent Progressive Majority Strategic Goals”) Part V: How’s American civilization looking now?
Here was a breakdown from the recent 2016 election, showing how this strategic goal is coming along:
Englishmen may be concerned about ‘the rights of Englishmen’ on which the USA was originally founded, which would make them ideal immigrants. But folks from the 3rd world typically want more totalitarian government control, just like back home. There are certainly patriotic exceptions, but averages will rule the day.
We can also see a prime illustration of demographics as destiny when looking at Britain. While they haven’t had as much immigration as the USA, their total population is smaller and so the proportional effects manifest sooner then they will in the US.
National Review in 2013 offers a brief article highlighting how those opposed to Thatcher deliberately engaged in a mass immigration program to alter the voter base and put themselves in permanent political power.
Throughout the developed world, the Left uses mass immigration and lies about racism to bend the sovereign, patriotic nation-state to its will. And it does so with plenty of help from its accomplices on the corporate and libertarian right.
The National Review piece links to an article by Peter Hitchens (bother of Christopher Hitchens) who used to be an ally of those elements. Definitely go read the whole thing, it is worth your time. He reflects on the mindset while he was part of that movement, saying (emphasis added):
When I was a Revolutionary Marxist, we were all in favour of as much immigration as possible.
It wasn’t because we liked immigrants, but because we didn’t like Britain. We saw immigrants – from anywhere – as allies against the staid, settled, conservative society that our country still was at the end of the Sixties.
Also, we liked to feel oh, so superior to the bewildered people – usually in the poorest parts of Britain – who found their neighbourhoods suddenly transformed into supposedly ‘vibrant communities’.
If they dared to express the mildest objections, we called them bigots.
Immigrants have been used by those who wanted to transform the country.
Absurdly, even when Britain’s frontiers were demolished by the Blair Government and hundreds of thousands of white-skinned Europeans came here to work, it was still possible to smear any doubters as ‘racists’.
It couldn’t have been more obvious that ‘race’ wasn’t the problem.
The thing that made these new residents different was culture – language, customs, attitudes, sense of humour.
Rather than them adapting to our way of life, we were adapting to theirs.
This wasn’t integration.
It was a revolution.
The screaming, spitting intolerance comes from a pampered elite who are ashamed of their own country, despise patriotism in others and feel none themselves.
They long for a horrible borderless Utopia in which love of country has vanished, nannies are cheap and other people’s wages are low.
The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”, according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.
He said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration” but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its “core working class vote”.
As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.
Rub the right’s nose in diversity? A deliberate but secret plan? Not stating their real reasons for fear it would alienate their main voters? The only discussion of immigration is on economic benefit and a need for more immigrants? Does this sound a lot like America over the past 8 years?
The article continues:
Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said: “Now at least the truth is out, and it’s dynamite.
“Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock up but also a conspiracy. They were right.
Again, what was originally tarred as ‘conspiracy theory’ for deviating from the official story turned out to be the truth, while the official story was a pack of lies. But that was back in 2009. The leaks have only gotten more embarrassing since then.
Labour sent out ‘search parties’ for immigrants to get them to come to the UK, Lord Mandelson has admitted.
In a stunning confirmation that the Blair and Brown governments deliberately engineered mass immigration, the former Cabinet Minister and spin doctor said New Labour sought out foreign workers.
He also conceded that the influx of arrivals meant the party’s traditional supporters are now unable to find work.
The American equivalent would be like Senator Marco Rubio retiring, and then a few years later admitting that critics were right and his work on the Senate and that whole “Gang of 8” thing was truly a deliberate push to massively change the makeup of America even if it meant Americans could no longer get jobs.
Tony Blair presided over a silent conspiracy to change the face of Britain for ever with mass immigration, an explosive book reveals.
He ordered his Labour government never to discuss in public the supposed ‘advantages’ of the unprecedented influx.
But behind the scenes ministers were instructed to wave tens of thousands of asylum seekers into the UK under cover of their being ‘economic migrants’. Astonishingly, the minister Mr Blair put in charge of borders ruled against deporting failed claimants because it would be too ‘emotional’.
The main aim of allowing in millions of people was to make the country ‘see the benefit of a multicultural society’. The Blair government did not see its job as being to ‘control immigration’.
…Mr Blair did not want the public to know his true plans on immigration. He is said to have told ministers and officials: ‘Don’t mention the advantages of immigration in public because they won’t even want that.’
The rules on allowing in foreign spouses and students were dramatically relaxed.
By the time he stepped down, over two million more migrants than the government expected had settled in Britain — but he dismissed any concerns by claiming they were good for the economy.
Anyone against free-flowing immigration was assumed to be a racist Tory, a view underpinned by the BBC’s reluctance to debate the issue and endorsed by Labour’s promotion of multiculturalism.
It is a lengthy article, but I highly recommend reading the whole thing because it details how the government ignored repeated warnings from critics (which ultimately came true), ignored repeated warning signs from its own bureaucrats that the rapidly rising flood of immigrants consisted of unskilled people lying about their origins simply to sign up for welfare benefits, and politicians continued to work against the very people who elected them in order to teach those dumb voters a lesson about questioning their superiors.
It is essentially a map of what is going on here in the USA right now. InfoWars has highlighted this, when political talking head and supposed “conservative” Bill Kristol says:
“Look, to be totally honest, if things are so bad as you say with the white working class, don’t you want to get new Americans in?” asked Kristol.
“You can make a case that America has been great because every — I think John Adams said this — basically if you are in free society, a capitalist society, after two or three generations of hard work everyone becomes kind of decadent, lazy, spoiled — whatever,” he added.“Then, luckily, you have these waves of people coming in from Italy, Ireland, Russia, and now Mexico, who really want to work hard and really want to succeed and really want their kids to live better lives than them and aren’t sort of clipping coupons or hoping that they can hang on and meanwhile grew up as spoiled kids and so forth. In that respect, I don’t know how this moment is that different from the early 20th century.”
Kristol’s assertion that immigrants are all hard working, tax contributing, upstanding citizens isn’t backed up by the facts, which show that “lazy” white people are less reliant on welfare.
Just like the British case we see those who supposedly defend the traditional stance of the country coming out and attacking the majority, preaching the supposed economic benefits of mass immigration, and ignoring all facts which prove the claim blatantly wrong.
Trump is trying to stop the mass immigration, but is being opposed again and again.
Twice now he has attempted to temporarily reduce immigration from known terrorist havens and both times activist judges have jumped in and declared it somehow unconstitutional. Andrew McCarthy gives a good analysis of the laws as they stand and why the court challenges have feet firmly planted in mid-air:
Let’s start with the Constitution, which vests all executive power in the president. Under the Constitution, as Thomas Jefferson wrote shortly after its adoption, “the transaction of business with foreign nations is Executive altogether. It belongs then to the head of that department, except as to such portions of it as are specifically submitted to the Senate. Exceptions are to be construed strictly.”…Mr. Bier asserts that Trump may not suspend the issuance of visas to nationals of specific countries because the 1965 immigration act “banned all discrimination against immigrants on the basis of national origin.”…As he correctly points out, the purpose of the anti-discrimination provision (signed by President Lyndon Johnson in 1965) was to end the racially and ethnically discriminatory “national origins” immigration practice that was skewed in favor of Western Europe. Trump’s executive order, to the contrary, is in no way an effort to affect the racial or ethnic composition of the nation or its incoming immigrants. The directive is an effort to protect national security from a terrorist threat……Federal immigration law also includes Section 1182(f), which states: “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate” (emphasis added).Section 1182(f) plainly and sweepingly authorizes the president to issue temporary bans on the entry of classes of aliens for national-security purposes. This is precisely what President Trump has done. In fact, in doing so, he expressly cites Section 1182(f), and his executive order tracks the language of the statute (finding the entry of aliens from these countries at this time “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States”).
Echoing a speech delivered by Trump the previous day in the economically devastated former steel town of Monessen, Pennsylvania, Sanders blames the collapse of American workers’ living standards and growth of social inequality on globalization and trade deals such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and Obama’s proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership.
He writes, “Millions of American voters, like the Leave supporters, are understandably angry and frustrated by the economic forces that are destroying the middle class.” He declares, “We need to fundamentally reject our ‘free trade’ policies and move to fair trade. Americans should not have to compete against workers in low-wage countries who earn pennies an hour. We must defeat the Trans-Pacific Partnership.”
Last July, two months after he announced his campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination, Sanders gave an interview with the Vox web site in which he denounced a policy of “open borders”—a basic tenet of genuine socialism, which upholds the right of workers to live and work wherever they choose with full citizenship rights—as a right-wing proposal that “would make everybody in America poorer.”
He continued: “You’re doing away with the concept of a nation state… Bring in all kinds of people, work for $2 or $3 an hour… You think we should open the borders and bring in a lot of low-wage workers, or do you think maybe we should try to get jobs for those [American] kids?”
The article goes on to defend Sanders by explaining that this was actually a secret move against the evil capitalist establishment. The socialist publication doesn’t seem so supportive of Sanders by January of 2017, however:
…Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders solidarized himself with the new president and his virulent economic nationalism.
On Monday morning, Trump signed an executive order withdrawing the US from the 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade pact. At the same time, Trump repeated his pledge to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with Mexico and Canada.
Declaring that these moves would be “great for the American worker,” Trump reiterated the claim that “unfair trade” benefiting workers in other countries—not capitalism and the corporations’ relentless pursuit of profit—was responsible for the closure of factories and slashing of American workers’ wages.
Sanders was quick to congratulate Trump, stating, “For the last 30 years, we have had a series of trade deals—including the North American Free Trade Agreement, permanent normal trade relations with China and others—which have cost us millions of decent-paying jobs and caused a ‘race to the bottom,’ which has lowered wages for American workers…
“If President Trump is serious about a new policy to help American workers, then I would be delighted to work with him.”
The article goes on to lament how Sanders fails to see that the brotherhood of workers in Mexico and other places will suffer as a result.
Conclusion? Sanders didn’t make the cut as a real socialist or a real Democrat or a real Progressive because he, like Trump, cares about making America be for Americans first. The socialist publication criticizing him laments Sanders’s failure to embrace the working class around the globe [i.e. globalism] against the evil billionaire fat cats. Ergo, Hillary [globalist] was engineered to be the winner of the Democrat party nomination no matter what the Democrat American voters say.
The AP recently reported (emphasis added):
Iran’s former hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sent a letter Sunday to President Donald Trump, striking a somewhat conciliatory tone while applauding immigration to America and saying it shows “the contemporary U.S. belongs to all nations.”
If one of your most bitter enemies is saying about a contentious internal policy, ‘Good, good, keep it up. I applaud you,’ then perhaps you ought to cease at once. If our enemies are cheering our actions, then we are doing something very stupid.
Further, what do the immigrants think? Here’s one quote from a growing faction (emphasis added):
Univision senior anchor Jorge Ramos declared on Friday that the United States belongs to Latino migrants, emphatically stating to a Spanish-speaking audience that “it is our country, not theirs.”
Ramos took an unusual tack, pivoting from talk of diversity and togetherness into boasts of conquest. Mass immigration, particularly illegal immigration, was a fait accompli. There is nothing the U.S. can do about it, and they must accept that America is “not their” country and that illegal aliens, particularly Latinos, “are not going to leave,” he said.
By the way, if you followed the links I shared above about Pizzagate, you would have seen via the Pizzagate wiki that Univision has financial ties to the Clintons. How big is Univision? Big enough that it beat all English-speaking networks for viewership in America for two years in a row. You may not watch it, but it is definitely NOT small potatoes in the corporate media landscape.
From two different directions we see recent declarations that America does not belong to Americans. Trump would stand in the way of this and return America’s future and prosperity to American citizens, and thus, in the role of President, he is a big problem for the establishment.
Part VIII: Neutralizing Trump
Basically, there are three options to neutralize Trump.
- Force him to support the establishment / globalist line.
- Smear him and then impeach or force resignation.
There are no other options. John F. Kennedy refused to play along so the CIA murdered him. Why not, he was going to dismantle the CIA along with neutering the Federal Reserve system. He wrote his own death warrant but at least he went out holding his ground against the Elite!
Why can We, The People rely on Trump to Make America Great Again? Why trust him more so than an establishment politician? The answer lies in attempting to understand why he ran in the first place.
Three months before the election, Lt. Col. Tom Kratman (ret.) observed:
Here’s one thing, though; while the Clintons are in politics for the graft and the girls – yes, I suspect both for both of them – selling influence, peddling pardons, soliciting and accepting gifts from foreign entities that no one could call our friends, Trump has all the money he needs and doesn’t have a lot of trouble acquiring trophy wives and girlfriends infinitely better looking than, say, Monica Lewinsky and surely close matches to Elizabeth Ward Gracen.
In other words, when President Trump leaves the White House, the china and furniture will likely remain where it’s supposed to be.
And then there’s what I think is the most important thing, the answer to the question of why Trump is even running. To me, it’s obvious: He doesn’t need graft or girls; he wants a better place in the history books than the one he’s earned so far as “slumlord to the elite.” He wants to earn that better place. This will tend to make him controllable, to make him at least try to keep his campaign promises in a way we haven’t seen since Reagan and defeating the Soviet Union. I expect that wall on our Southern border to go up. I expect him to repudiate the globalist “Free trade” agreements that have allowed the world’s piratical and parasitic “elite” to loot us, Russia, Europe, everyone not of their little class. I expect some bureaucracy trimming. Why? Because he’s such a great guy? No, because he wants that place in the history books.
Conversely, I suspect Hillary intends to, and is sure she can, dictate what the history books will be allowed to say.
A similar observation was made at HeatStreet back in April during the primaries:
He is enduring this relentless, bipartisan assault because the ruling party knows he has chosen the American people over them.
Ask yourself this: why did Donald Trump run for president in the first place? I believe that the real reason is that he, like you, is deeply concerned about the current state of the United States of America, and he, like you, fears for its future.
If you cannot bring yourself to trust in Trump’s words, then you can safely trust in his vanity. It is true, of course, that every recent president has betrayed his supporters: George H.W. Bush raised taxes, Bill Clinton had sex with that woman, George W. Bush embraced an arrogant foreign policy, and Barack Obama has waged war from Syria to Ukraine. Will not Donald Trump do the same?
It is possible, but unlikely. Donald Trump loves to be loved by the American people. And it defies everything we know about human nature to believe that he will throw away that intoxicating populist love in favor of the approval of an anti-nationalist elite whose affections he has already rejected.
I’ve also heard it put as: if you can’t trust in the vanity of a man who puts his name in giant gold letters over everything he owns, then what can you trust?
How are the predictions turning out? One journalist got to observe thanks to an inside tip on an event the press weren’t invited to. Here’s a quote that typifies the whole story (definitely go read the rest):
8:45 PM: Trump is served his entree. According to a waiter, who wished to remain anonymous:
“The President ordered a well-done steak. An aged New York strip. He ate it with catsup as he always does. The sides and appetizers on the table were shared. Three jumbo shrimp cocktails were delivered before the meal. At one point, the President looked at his watch and remarked ”They are filming ‘Saturday Night Live’ right now. Can’t wait to see what they are gonna do to me this week.“ It was hard to serve him because he is so funny and relaxed, it makes you laugh.”
Trump talks jovially with his guests for the next two hours. His iconic hand motions fill the space as dinner is served.
9:31 PM: Tillerson and his wife cross the restaurant and enter the Secret Service barrier of Trump’s table. The Secretary of State makes small talk with Nigel Farage and the Trump family. The Tillersons say their goodnights to the party and leave the steakhouse to cheers and handshakes from other guests. I am told by restaurant staff that Trump picked up their tab for dinner.
If this is truly the character of Donald Trump, then it is extremely unlikely that he would back down and dance according to the globalist tune. That only leaves options for removal: smear and impeach him, or else assassinate him.
Smearing him is unlikely. The mainstream media has been giving it their very best since he entered the primaries. Nothing sticks to him. He might as well be called Teflon Trump.
One of their best shots went down in infamy as “PeeGate” (InfoWars has a good summary).
Here’s the guy who couldn’t wait to bring down his party’s presidential victory:
So, can the establishment dig up some dirt on Trump to get him impeached or force him to resign? With all the data the NSA and CIA have been collecting, if it exists it would have been used by now. If the establishment and media are so desperate to smear Trump that now they are jumping on fake stories like PeeGate, then they are truly desperate and have already exhausted any better leverage they had.
Pence responded Tuesday by labeling the comments “absurd” and “frankly offensive” during a discussion with radio host Laura Ingraham.
“I would find all of that dialogue to be absurd and frankly offensive,” Pence said. “It is the greatest honor of my life to serve shoulder-to-shoulder with the 45th President of the United States.”
Now, if Pence is being honest, then he would not support an impeachment. This would mean assassination is the only other alternative.
Additionally, since so many Americans see Trump as “their” man, they would not tolerate impeachment either unless it were for the most egregious betrayal. Look at how Bill Clinton skated through his impeachment, and how Obama could not even be touched by impeachment. To think that heartland working America would sit by and accept impeachment of Donald Trump is likely to kick off civil war.
On the other hand, if Pence is lying and would back an impeachment because he’s on board with the establishment, removal of Trump still ignite a civil war amongst Americans who are sick of progressive neighbors telling them how to live; neighbors who celebrate lawlessness when Democrats do it, but come down hard on the slightest deviation of conservatives.
Pence: LBJ in waiting?
Is Pence an establishment pawn or the bold fighter the conservative media currently makes him out to be?
I’ll answer it with two complaints from a successful but staunch biblical pastor in Indiana, writing prior to Pence’s nomination.
In 2014, he touched on Pence’s failures to protect parental authority by working to expand mandatory public schooling:
Take the administration of Governor Mike Pence here in Indiana, for instance. Gov. Pence could be using his Republican majority to legislate greater protections for parental control of the education of their children. Instead, this good Christian man is working to bring more of our state’s children under government control. Right now he’s spending his political capital in an effort to expand public education to pre-Kindergarten children. Yet this will only further facilitate parents’ abandonment of their children. Thus grows the control of the state over the Christian home and family.
In early 2015, on a different issue, he wrote a public letter to then-Governor Pence:
Dear Governor Pence,
I’m so sorry to see you capitulate to the lies and bullying of wicked men. None of your actions as governor have made clearer who you really are than your calling for and signing this new “clarification” to the RFRA bill.
What you’ve done is simply confirm to the wicked that they can shout loud enough and bully hard enough and they will get their way. You made it even harder for the next governor to pass just and righteous laws. You’ve demoralized those who care about freedom. You’ve thrown the majority who believe in liberty under the bus. What you’ve done is lost my confidence, not to mention my vote.
What we need is men in office who are willing to do what is right even when it’s hard. Up until now I had a hope that was you.
Two days earlier, he highlighted a video showing the hypocrisy (no progressive complaints about Muslim bakeries refusing to cater to gay weddings) that men like Pence were signing on to:
The last two weeks have been disastrous for any future political aspirations of Indiana Governor Mike Pence. In fact, some are wondering if he’ll even be able to get reelected?
Meanwhile, here’s a short video lampooning the hypocrisy of Tim Cook and his fellow homosexualists who attacked our RFRA legislation. It also does a good job showing the Christian faithlessness of our state’s legislators and their Republican Governor throwing in the towel and appeasing the homosexualists on Maundy Thursday, the very day when, from fear, our Lord’s Disciples deserted Him.
Pence looks like an establishment politician currently enjoying serving alongside a man who possesses a spine. Maybe he’ll fight to keep things that way, or maybe he’ll play with the establishment to get a better seat. Either way, he does not have the lightning-rod charisma that Trump has with the American people, and removal of Trump whether Pence plays along or not will be the final straw for many Americans.
Part IX: Assassination Today
This doesn’t have to be the stuff of thriller fiction novels.
How safe is the White House?
Recently, former Secret Service Agent Dan Bongino made the starling revelation that the White House itself is no longer safe due to the lack of Secret Service assets and outdated technology.
We truly believe that an attack consisting of multiple threats at once couldn’t be repelled or slowed long enough to get President trump into the secure bunker under the White House, or removed from the grounds via evacuation protocol.
The 2013 movie Olympus Has Fallen details how a fairly sophisticated attack could be carried out to capture the President or kill him. Even an operation of only 10-20 armed terrorists could probably execute a suicide mission and be successful. This is a sad day when our own President is so close to outside forces in his own home. Is the Secret Service really ready for a multi pronged attack on the grounds? I’ve often wondered that, and with the history of single threats gaining access even inside the house in the past, maybe it’s time the Secret Service steps up its game.
The other major threat could be an agrieved or radicalized member of the Secret service itself. A recent example is the assassination of the Russian Ambassador to turkey who was shot by his own bodyguard. Is this far fetched? Maybe not. What if the Elite simply coerce a member onto the plot threatening their entire family with mysterious death one by one if he/she wouldn’t follow through? Hell, the CIA murdered JFK with several black ops teams, in a classic set-up, what would they do today?
I already showed that it is a matter of public record that the CIA had an undetectable “heart attack gun” as far back in 1975 in order to illegally assassinate people. Now the Vault 7 leaks show that they were working on hacking modern vehicle control systems to cause fatal car crashes.
This type of technology isn’t made to decorate an office shelf. It’s made to be used. I’m not aware of any confirmed uses, but here’s a recently familiar list which is highly suspicious.
You may have heard of the Clinton kill list. Versions of it have been circling the internet since the early 1990’s. Many are not trustworthy because they include many names that were only loosely connected to the Clintons, or list people who are still alive as if they were killed. Some of the lists have up to 100 names.
WND did some digging and pared the list down to 33 actual suspicious deaths. These are people who were actually close to the Clintons, are actually dead, and died under suspicious or unsolved circumstances. As Rush Limbaugh pointed out in interview (quoted in the WND article) the vast majority of folks, even those with large public reputations, don’t have any acquaintances who died or were murdered under suspicious circumstances. For Bill and Hillary Clinton, the count is somewhere up around several dozen. Look at the list and note some of the following:
- How many were VERY close with the Clintons.
- How many were involved in work or writing that would paint the Clintons in a negative light, and died just before completing that work.
- How many died unexpectedly of “heart attack”. (Heart attack gun, perhaps?)
- Contradictory or conflicted accounts of death, like
- Committed suicide by shooting self in the BACK of the head
- Murder for robbery, even though nothing was stolen
- Dropped barbell crushed throat while weight training just before testifying, but officially died of heart attack.
But it’s not as if suspicious deaths have to appear to be done by establishment types to protect the reputation of establishment types.
Here’s a list of suspicious major banker deaths since the crash, with citations to news sources. A review notes that these deaths are suspiciously all by action or heart attack; no other natural causes. The winner is definitely the one who “shot himself 7 or 8 times in the head and torso with a nail gun.” Is it establishment types knocking off folks who knew too much? Or angry citizens engaging in a bit of vigilantism? JP Morgan had motive of financial gain as well as many ties to the CIA.
Aside from the high profile JFK assassination and all its unanswered questions, there are many, many suspicious and questionable deaths occurring among those who knew too much or were in a position to blow the whistle on massive amounts of high crimes (the type that affect the course of nations).
One thing that shows Trump in an especially dangerous position is that the last man who tried to dismantle the CIA after its botched lawless behavior was JFK. Before he could make any moves to accomplish his publicly stated goal to “splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the wind,” he died suddenly under highly questionable circumstances. (Recall, as I shared above, a confirmed conspiracy is that of JFK’s death, according to the 2nd congressional hearing on it.) Seven days before he died suddenly, JFK said:
There’s a plot in this country to enslave every man, woman and child. Before I leave this high and noble office, I intend to expose this plot.
Do Americans today have more freedom or less than in the 1960’s? Much less. So, are we more enslaved now than we were back then? Absolutely.
You should also consider the dire warning of President Eisenhower in the 1950’s before he left office. Most of us have seen this, however, he lived because he kept his mouth shut until the end, or he likely would have gone away too.
Part X: Balkanization and American Civil War II
It is a fact of history that homogeneous nations arise out of heterogeneous nations. Since 1965, America has been full-speed ahead on making itself as heterogeneous, or “diverse,” as possible.
The result, especially after 8 years of Obama aggravating racial tensions, is a far more divided society. Combined with an acceptance and even celebration of lawlessness, and it is a powder keg waiting to blow.
Prior to the Obergefell decision which forced gay-marriage upon the land, I recall pointing out to a liberal in my social circles that in 2014, no less than seven State Attorneys General refused to do their jobs and enforce the laws of their state, in addition to the Federal executive apparatus illegally abandoning DOMA. These weren’t objections based in religion, but simple declarations that since they disagreed with the laws, they would simply do as they saw fit. I asked the liberal if they saw the problem here, that as soon as the shoe was on the other foot, they’d likely be screaming about Republican politicians refusing to execute their jobs in accordance with law. The reply was, “No, I think it is a very good thing that all these officials are doing.” But sure enough, as soon as a county clerk in Kentucky objected on religious grounds to signing gay marriage licenses, this very liberal was screaming loudly on social media for the immediate termination of this official for refusing to enforce the law (just recently legislated from the Supreme Court Bench). The other problem in this double standard is that the county clerk offered a valid alternative, and simply didn’t want to be involved. The State AG’s occupying office left the people with no alternative and made it their personal mission to obstruct the law.
And then there are all the cases of liberal and progressive tolerance of voter fraud, so long as it is in their favor.
What do you do when approximately half of your fellow citizens celebrate lawlessness so long as it works in their favor? Is it even possible for a “social contract” to exist anymore at that point? “Laws for thee but not for me?” Should I stand by and play fair and operate within the system while my neighbor cheats as hard as possible to create new laws to disadvantage me? I’m keeping my personal answer to myself, but a large swath of citizens will soon be asking themselves this, and the answers are not going to be pretty.
Just because you are tolerant toward your neighbor doesn’t mean they will be tolerant toward you. There’s plenty of hype in the media about the evils of white supremacist groups like the KKK. Just because a black man like Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell or Ben Carson lives next door and harbors no racism doesn’t mean the KKK will say, “Nah, you’re cool with us.”
Likewise, if you are not part of BLM and you had a neighbor like this, demanding even at point of violence that you must surrender your money, your house and your property for social change, do you really think if you told him how tolerant and not-racist you are he’ll make an exception for you?
Or when this BLM leader publically insists that all white people are genetically inferior sub-humans who need to be wiped out as a race, do you think she might say, “Except you, since you say you’re color-blind to race?”
Or what if this fine example of the modern American college student of 2016 were going to school with your daughter? He and three others raped her, urinated on her and degraded her, got it all on video, told her she deserved because of her skin color, and finished up by saying “That’s for 400 years of slavery you b—-!” I don’t know about you but my ancestors (from several continents) were not in this country 400 years ago, and some of them not even 100 years ago.
Or what if these four guys were your neighbors, who have the stomach to kidnap and torture a special needs kid while cursing Trump and all white people and upload the torture video to the net?
I already quoted the Univision anchor above, speaking for Hispanics when saying “America belongs to us now!” Do you think that attitude would include “…and black people too, they can stay,” or “…and white Republicans too, like Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush and George Zimmerman?”
Whenever someone boasts about being a [something]-American, is their allegiance to America or the group identity in front of the hyphen? If violence breaks out between the [something] and those who see themselves as simply “American,” which side do you think the hyphenated-Americans will take? (I’m including all European descendants as well who boast about being Irish-American or Italian-American or whatever.)
My point is NOT that any one race needs to take arms against any other particular race.
Rather, my point is that “tolerance” tends to only exist either among white liberals in gated communities, or among rural conservative communities who put American values ahead of racial identity. If your neighbor doesn’t fit into one of those two categories, then you might be a target of opportunity when violence breaks out.
Consider this article written by a survivor of Yugoslavia, who says:
Yet the collapse of Yugoslavia offers several cautionary tales to Americans today, and if they are wise they will heed them and set the United States on a correction course before it is too late. As one who witnessed the dreadful collapse of Yugoslavia and its terrible aftermaths — including the seemingly permanent impoverishment of Southeastern Europe, mired in crime, corruption, and extremism — I would very much like America to discover a far happier fate.
However, some of the parallels are eerie and troubling.
The root of Yugoslavia’s collapse was economic, particularly its parlous state finances.
After two years of study, Krajgher’s commission in 1983 released its report, which correctly assessed that Yugoslavia needed to get its economic house in order to avoid financial, and then political, collapse…Its effect, however, was zero. The report was ignored, and Communist officials never made any effort to seriously implement any of Krajgher’s solid recommendations. It was too politically painful to make cuts, so the government pretended there was no problem. Until it was too late.
Comparisons to Obama are unavoidable. Early in his first term, he empowered a bi-partisan board, known colloquially as the Simpson-Bowles commission, to investigate improving the long-term condition of America’s state finances. The commission’s findings were thorough and persuasive, and they offered a way out of the country’s fiscal morass. At a minimum, Simpson-Bowles set the terms for a necessary debate. But Obama inexplicably pretended that his own commission ever existed. No debate ensued, since discussing cuts of government benefits to voters is electorally toxic — Republicans are no more eager to talk about this pain than Democrats — and nothing happened.
Worse, economic problems, including unemployment and inflation that impoverished Yugoslavs rapidly — by the time the country went over the cliff in 1991, real incomes were half what they had been a generation before — exacerbated the country’s serious ethnic grievances. When combined with economic emergency, Yugoslavia’s ethnic politics proved a lethal combination that led directly to wars and genocide.
Yugoslavia was a very diverse country, ethnically and religiously, and the divisions between groups were real and serious. Unlike 21st century Americans, Yugoslavs were under no illusions that “diversity is our greatest strength” — they knew the opposite was the truth — and the Communists went to great lengths to keep ethnic peace by banning what we would term “hate speech” while mandating that the official doctrine that Yugoslavia’s diverse peoples really loved each other deeply be placed at the level of quasi-religious dogma…
Perhaps worst of all, by preventing any honest discussion of ethnic matters, the Communists had a perverse knack of making each of Yugoslavia’s many ethnic groups feel that it was uniquely aggrieved.
Playing political games with race and ethnicity in any multinational society is a dangerous thing. Obama, by promising that he wanted to be president of all Americans, then governing as a highly partisan Democrat, has laid the groundwork for a hazardous future for the United States, hardly helped by his public indulging of black nationalism, particularly his incautious discussion of crimes both real and imagined against African Americans. However verboten discussion of white nationalism is at present among polite Americans, it is unavoidable that this will become an issue in the future, with potentially explosive consequences — to say nothing of the rise of Hispanic and Asian nationalisms too, as the United States becomes even more diverse than Yugoslavia was.
Do we really believe that America will succeed were every other nation in history has failed? Here is an interesting warning from all the way back in Aristotle’s day (Politics, book 5, part 3[emphasis added]):
Another cause of revolution is difference of races which do not at once acquire a common spirit; for a state is not the growth of a day, any more than it grows out of a multitude brought together by accident. Hence the reception of strangers in colonies, either at the time of their foundation or afterwards, has generally produced revolution; for example, the Achaeans who joined the Troezenians in the foundation of Sybaris, becoming later the more numerous, expelled them; hence the curse fell upon Sybaris. At Thurii the Sybarites quarrelled with their fellow-colonists; thinking that the land belonged to them, they wanted too much of it and were driven out. At Byzantium the new colonists were detected in a conspiracy, and were expelled by force of arms; the people of Antissa, who had received the Chian exiles, fought with them, and drove them out; and the Zancleans, after having received the Samians, were driven by them out of their own city. The citizens of Apollonia on the Euxine, after the introduction of a fresh body of colonists, had a revolution; the Syracusans, after the expulsion of their tyrants, having admitted strangers and mercenaries to the rights of citizenship, quarrelled and came to blows; the people of Amphipolis, having received Chalcidian colonists, were nearly all expelled by them.
After making his point, he immediately provides no less than 8 examples which would have been familiar to readers in his day, where admitting large groups of people foreign to your civilization lead to revolution.
Here’s another pointer toward Balkanization, from American expat Fred Reed who now resides in Mexico:
Is it possible for the United States to break up, either de facto or formally?
I wonder. The country is not a happy place. Today it is more consciously and resentfully divided, politically, regionally, racially and by sex and class than perhaps ever before. The rich prosper and the middle class sink. Three major racial blocs eye each other with fear and hostility. The hard left controls the media and government against the desires of much of the country, enforcing social engineering that is deeply disliked. Feminists make war on men, and destroy the schools and universities. Washington is widely loathed. Rules, laws, and regulations never voted on grow ever more burdensome and intrusive. Many quietly want out. The question is how to get there.
Defiance of federal law grows common. For example,“Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) says Chicago is the friendliest immigrant city in the nation since they, “made sure that we no longer cooperate with immigration authorities when it comes to the deportation or separation of our families.”
A US congressman, and a US president, defy federal law. This is an ungluing of note.
What can Washington do if states and regions simply go their own way? If large number of people stop paying income taxes, say? One tax evader can be arrested. Fifty thousand cannot. A problem for the feds is that if a state’s police decline to enforce federal laws, the feds have to do it themselves, and they don’t have the manpower.
So as the Fatal Four southwestern states [CA, TX, AZ, NM] become ever more Latino, what if they de facto eliminate the border with Mexico? They wouldn’t describe it that way. They probably wouldn’t describe it at all. They would just ignore sovereignty. In a globalizing world, the very idea of sovereignty seems less important that it once did. I will guess that the young, who will one day be older, care less than their elders about national identity.
How then would Washington enforce its will? Send the Army? Bomb Los Angeles? Them as has the numbers gets their way. And are getting it.
In the past the rock-solid unity of the United States existed because people wanted it. The foundation was a largely uniform white, Christian, European culture which no one thought about because there was no reason to think about it. Minorities were minor enough that they had to conform to the dominant culture. People shared ideas of morality, education, crime, music, religion, dress, manners, and patriotism.
That unity is gone forever. The old, functioning system has been replaced, not by another functioning system, such as that of Japan, China, or Korea, but by civilizational chaos. A law of human behavior is that people want to live among people like themselves. Another is that they do not like being ruled from afar by people they detest. Who likes Washington today?
Here’s another national example – Ukraine. Cracked gives 5 examples of how civil war here could play out similarly. Here are some interesting quotes:
We’ve got no shortage of political strife in the USA. But for all the antagonism inherent in our democracy, we all agree to put up with the Other Guys when they win power. The only alternative to that would be some sort of civil war, and that kind of thing could never happen here. The people of Ukraine thought the same thing two years ago. And then, while they were busy getting degrees, raising families, and starting careers, a civil war snuck up and slapped their lives right in the…
Ukraine’s civil war started after a months-long protest unseated the president. People in Western Ukraine were generally happy with this development. But over in the East, where the president enjoyed more support, people were less happy. Within a matter of weeks a huge chunk of Eastern Ukraine, centered around the city of Donetsk, declared itself a new country…
A month or two before, these people had all just been her fellow citizens. In less time than it takes to earn an Introduction to Psychology credit, their political differences had made the leap from amiable disagreements to people dying in the streets.
The first soldiers we saw at a checkpoint on our way to the front seemed to back this up. They had nice uniforms, full body armor, and weapons all over their bodies. Our interpreter pointed out that they might’ve actually been cops. Apparently, there’s not much of a line between the two in a warzone.
If you live in the suburbs, imagine the city nearest to you seceded from the United States. Suddenly Houston is a battleground, but, shit, you still need to go there — you might even work there. That doesn’t change just because some fools with cannons happen to be blasting the shit out of the Jamba Juice.
During the Civil War, the Lincoln administration arrested at least 14,401 civilians: one person out of every 1,563 in the country. Again, this pattern is repeated in Ukraine.
They also offer 6 reasons a civil war might actually start in the USA now. One of the more interesting items is an almost total breakdown of trust between citizens from the 1970’s to now:
“Trust” isn’t just an intangible concept when we’re talking about the potential for civil warfare. Sinisa Malesevic is a professor who studies the sociology of civil wars and a survivor of the Yugoslavian civil war. He’s someone Marvel really should’ve reached out to for script advice, and he noted the breakdown of trust was one of the first traumatizing steps to war, “… in a very short period of time, there is a complete sense of fear, you do not know who is who, who is supporting which side … that fear spreads.”
Sinisa also pointed out that most civil wars start after a loss of trust in the government, particularly law enforcement: “One of the defining features of any state is a legitimate monopoly on the use of violence.” In other words, if we trust the police to handle bad guys better than armed groups of vigilantes, we’ll probably trust the government more than armed groups of insurgents.
“And if police are not seen as doing their job … I think that certainly has an impact.”
Mike Cernovich gives an excellent summary and collage of how exactly that is happening now.
After police allowed left wing activists to pepper spray several women at a MILO event at Berkeley, free speech activists took lawful self-defense into their own hands. Thus, at a March 4th pro-Trump rally, people entered the fray prepared.
Left wing police departments issue stand-down orders allowing women to be beaten, pepper sprayed, and raped. The police in liberal cities like Berkeley and San Jose will not do their jobs. They do not “serve and protect.”
Women are attacked by the feral left. The fake news media won’t speak out against this. The police won’t do their jobs. It’s up to private citizens to stand up for one another.
There’s Milo Yiannopoulos again, whom I mentioned as a case study of establishment workings. Defintely take a look at Cernovich’s article, as it gives many photos of all the victimized Trump supporters who lost blood while police forces stood by and watched.
Part XI: The Battle Lines
Ann Barnhardt (known for having publicly shut down her Wall Street brokerage and advised her clients to exit all stock markets after seeing the horrifying precedents set in the MF Global collapse) speculated some time ago in 2010 about how the lines will be drawn in US Balkanization:
I have received many emails and have heard much talk about the U.S. breaking into two countries ‐ one Constitutional Republic built on a foundation of Christian principles consisting of the Mountain, Central and Southern states (essentially a Second American Republic), and a Marxist‐Socialist‐Atheist confederation consisting of the Pacific Coast states, the Upper Midwest (IL, MI, WI) and the New England states.
This recent OCT2016 electoral map supports her predictions quite well, along the lines I have highlighted about racial tensions:
The creator is actually a liberal who was trying to show the horrible prevalence of all those racist white Trump supporters.
He used data from 538 and Nate Silver. But take a good look at the option labeled “College Educated Whites.” We know the colleges and universities in America today are bastions of liberal indoctrination and anti-American sentiment. If you ignore all people of color (who would vote so overwhelmingly for the Orwellian State that any exceptions are statistically insignificant), that leaves the white voting bloc, of which the college educated fall out exactly as Barnhardt predicted 6 years ago. There’s your battle lines for globalist vs. nationalist.
If we add the racial division factor, then the 4 states along the Mexican border are likely to become part of Mexico in all but official name. Looking further at racial demographics, black population is most heavily concentrated across the Southern belt (East of the Mississippi and South of the Mason Dixon Line). If BLM grew into a full-fledged open militia movement akin to examples in Yugoslavia and Ukraine, you can expect those Southern States to sink into their own battles for identity.
So we’re looking at at least SIX different territories coming out of a breakup of the USA. (Alaska and Hawaii are islands or effectively islands and totally on their own.) If the blue central northern states split the red Northeast States from the American Redoubt Northwest, then you’d effectively have SEVEN territories in civil war.
What will it be like? If you haven’t gotten a close enough look from the academic comparisons above, Peter Grant collects a nice set of links and points out how well they line up with his personal experience fighting in the civil wars in South Africa:
Understand that when they call Donald Trump “illegitimate,” what they are really saying is that our desire to govern ourselves is illegitimate. Their beef isn’t with him – it’s with us, the normal people who dared rise up and demand their right to participate in the rule of this country and this culture.
. . .
They are fanatics, and by not surrendering, by not kneeling, and by not obeying, you have committed an unpardonable sin. You have defied the Left, and you must be broken. They will take your job, slander your name, even beat or kill you – whatever it takes to break you and terrify others by making you an example. Your defiance cannot stand; they cannot allow this whole Trump/GOP majority thing to get out of control. They must crush this rebellion of the normal, and absolutely nothing is off the table.
We’ve seen them burn UC Berkeley and how the police controlled by the leftist state government of California stood by and watched as Americans were beaten by the mob. Why? Because the government of the State of California approves of the violence. Do you think it’s a coincidence that California is doing everything it can to disarm its normals?
The Left won’t say it out loud – at least not yet – but make no mistake. If violence is what it takes for the Left to prevail, then violence we will have. You saw it, and you were meant to. Berkeley was a message about the price of dissent where leftist hold sway. And they seek to hold sway everywhere.
Riot Control, Part 1 and Part 2 (with more to come)
(To those of you who’ve never been in a deadly serious, knock-down-and-drag-out, kill-the-bastards riot: if you live in a major US city, you’d better be thinking about this right now. I had the misfortune to be in three such situations before I came to this country. It’s no fun at all. I only survived them by being harder than the rioters. That’s all I’ll say about that.)
Go see the rest there. It is ALL must-read material highlighting how the country is coming to open blows between citizens, and the government is too emasculated and under-manned and inefficient to do anything about it. If the firemen are now being issued body armor in the big ‘Sanctuary’ cities, that says a lot.
Part X: Invasion Risks
Think back on how bloody the first civil war was, and then think about what a six or seven-way blood feud is going to look today.
But in today’s global climate, don’t you think America’s enemies would be happy to come and feast on the carcass? And America at that point would not be the America who fought and won a 2-front war in WWII (3-front, if you count that the Army and Navy would not cooperate in the Pacific Theater.)
Barnhardt warned of this foreign risk in her prediction. The warning is that the Marxist blue state territories WILL fail because their narrative about how they wish reality should be will fall flat when reality hits them without all the red states to carry the load. But when they fail, they’ll come crawling to the true American territories begging for a bailout. And we’ll want to say, “You made your bed, now sleep in it!” But they won’t suck it up and live with their consequences. They’ll turn elsewhere for a bailout. And who’d be more than happy to help them than our major adversaries?
I have doubts about theories with Russia, given the latest current events. Putin has made a reputation for himself as a nationalist, which opposes globalist agenda moves. Russia has been quite restrained despite actions by Obama and Clinton to push a war, all while RINO’s beat the war drums in the background. Would Russia take advantage of America given the chance? I don’t doubt it. Maybe they’ll finally grab Alaska.
However, China is more diametrically opposed to traditional American values as was Soviet Russia. China already has practice in depopulation of its own people, and is a far better power player to serve globalist interests. Theories involving Russia working for globalists would first need to account for Putin’s nationalist moves inside his own country. But if China is on a real estate buying spree, it would be easy enough to buy ports in Mexico and enter America from the south, akin to the Soviet/Cuba situation in the 1960’s.
Trump is the glue holding back the American Saxons from diving in and meeting the violent left on its own terms. If he is removed, it’s game over for America.
How might China gain a foothold on American soil?
This is the longshot prediction because so much more can happen to change the course of events between here and there. I would argue that the Balkanization is unavoidable, and the civil war WILL come. But depending how those battles play out, elements of the following may or may not come to pass as predicted.
There’s already been talk criticizing Trump’s stance toward Mexico because Mexico as a result is getting friendly with China.
China is amassing wealth all over the world: major property, infrastructure, etc.
Let’s say we see a 7 way split of US territory as predicted above. (Russia gets Alaska as an 8th territory. Who knows about Hawaii?) If Mexico is already aligning trade with China, and the US states on the Mexican border basically become colonized ‘New’ Mexico, then deals with Mexico would likely cover that slice as well.
Likewise, I think Barnhardt is right about the forecast for the Marxist states. California might break in half, with the south half joining the reclaimed Mexico territory, and the north half joining the liberal Blue PacCoast. So when (not if) the Marxist policies in total opposition to reality ultimately fail, they’ll beg for a bailout. The two remaining true remaining Patriot regions would be the American Redoubt (Idaho / Montana / Wyoming / Utah) and the Red NE, divided by the blue liberal northern states as a single territory. The three Marxist regions would be New England, Pacific Coast, and Blue North. Those three regions would need a bailout. If the American Redoubt and Red territories are slogging through civil war, they likely can’t afford nor would want to bailout the Marxist territories they’ve been fighting. So the Marxists turn to China, assuming Chinese currency still has value in that year.
China could make a deal for exclusive trade with those territories. So they trade with China in lieu of former fellow US states. This creates economic isolation on the final American states akin to what we currently do to Iran via trade sanctions. Additionally, China may be willing to supply the three blue territories with weaponry to continue aggression with the two red territories.
What about the South territory? If the current behavior of BLM is any indicator, then the South territory will become a war zone indistinguishable from any war-torn country in Africa, which even the highest bidding nation wouldn’t be able to keep control over.
Canada would likely remain an neutral party on the Northern border.
The American Redoubt is bigger and has more resources and more defensive terrain, which means it will likely be the last refuge of the American Patriot since the sister territory in the east won’t last long. The American Redoubt could then be flanked both economically and militarily, but will surely be the last stand of the Patriots. Could we survive and come back from such a scenario? We may yet find out.
Then US guts itself in civil war, and our foreign enemies arrive in time to figuratively loot Uncle Sam’s corpse where it lies dead on the field of battle. China now controls large swaths of formerly American infrastructure, without using those overly destructive weapons of war. The USA as 50 United States was powerful. But smaller territories hurting from bitter conflict will not be a world influence anymore. They’ll be small players on the world stage akin to any single country in Europe or the Middle East.
What hope do you have, as a true American who still believes in the Founders’ dream?
Give the best life you can to your children and perhaps grand children. Get yourself to a self-sufficient and defensible piece of land, build community connections, and be ready to survive as long as possible without the luxuries of the current national production industries. America the Beautiful stretching from Sea to Shining Sea may at that time be a chapter in the history books, but if neither you nor your children are facing famine or war on your local turf, then you’re in a far better place than those in the sanctuary cities.
How can you safeguard your family and get into position?
Everything is farfetched until it happens. A major earthquake, stock market crash, tsunami, socioeconomic crash and of course an assassination and foreign invasion. This country will inevitably face destruction on a scale never before seen. It matters not when; it only matters if you’re ‘in position’ to survive.
We have penned another full feature article just on this subject alone. Be sure to check it out after digesting the enormity of this one.
You can read it by clicking here: Bugging Out vs. Full Time Retreat
*This article was written and edited by the ‘anonymous’ Redoubt Analyst. He made his Strategic Relocation to the American Redoubt fleeing the Sanctuary Cities of the East Coast and is now raising his family in the freedom of Northern Idaho.